Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"'. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />Minut.a of R.gular Council K..ting <br />Jun. 27, 1983 <br />Page Piv. <br /> <br />Aft.r diacussion, Hicks mov.d, sacond.d by Woodburn, that Council <br />taka the po.ition that the g.od.aic ham. i. not appropriate in <br />Chatha..; that this ar.a i" a Plannad Unit Dav.lopunt vith an im- <br />pliad l.gislativa intant a. damonstratad by plana .ubmi.ttad to tha <br />Planning Com.i.aion and Council prior to granting the Pl.nnad Unit <br />D.v.lop...nt to B.n Con to d.v.lop the Chath.m ar.a. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In furthar diacu.sion, it vas qu.ri.d whath.r othar ham.. have <br />actu.lly b.an built in the Chatha. d.v.lop...nt. Z.hm said sh. has <br />no knovl.dg. of issuanca of building parmits for ho..a oth.r than <br />tho.a propoa.d by B.n Con. <br /> <br />Th. h.ight of the g.od..ic ham. v.a ~u.riad; an.w.r vas 21'. <br /> <br />Chri.ti.n.an .aid h. va. not on tha Council at the ti.e Ch.th.m v.. <br />d...lop.d; f.als preaant Council is "hanging it. h.t" on the int.nt <br />of Council .t that ti..; not.d thia conting.ncy i. not li.t.d in <br />the SUP. <br /> <br />Mulcahy ask.d to rule the ..otion out of ord.r; Council is asauming <br />wa have a Building Per.it applic.tion; f..ls Council should obtain <br />.n opinion fro. the City Attorn.y on CouDcil's authority to give . <br />Building P.r.it for tha ham. r.qu..t.d. <br /> <br />Blair .sk.d if the PUD dict.t.a the type of ham. or the ua. of the <br />l.nd? An.w.r v.a "both". <br /> <br />a..idant (n...a not giv.n) s.id only 4 or 5 atyl.s of ho.aa ara in <br />the .ntir. Ch.tha. .r.a; ham.. have int.rior ch.ng.. and .xt.rior <br />ch.ng.. vbicb.r. co.m.tic in n.tur.. <br /> <br />McAllist.r said sh. raally like the do.. ho..; rac.ivad savaral <br />phon. calla today, so.. .aid thay would like a do.a in Ch.th.m. <br />McAlliat.r said sh.'d like . doma in har naighborbood, but the <br />paopla wbo bought in Chatham v.re led to baliav. only c.rtain <br />d.aign. vould ba built tbar.; cona.quantly, will vat. for the <br />motion. <br /> <br />Cbristiansen .aid ba is not cartain .11 tha ho.as in Chatha. .re <br />built to only tha de.ign~submitted by B.n Con. <br /> <br />Hicks. s.id h~ is not oppo.ad to geod.sic ho..ea; feals th.y ere <br />incon.istant witb the boas. in this PUD; only two lot. app.rently <br />r.m.in .. a p.rt of this plan; statad ha would'not h.v. approv.d <br />the mix of dvalling. to includa a do.a; f.al. it i. incon.ist.nt <br />with the intant of the SUP. <br /> <br />Mulcahy ..id h. is di..ppoint.d w. h.va a motion b.for. us; fora- <br />.... that Council is putting it.alf in . position of vh.th~r it is <br />pl....d or displeased with a dome ham., which i. a zoning admini- <br />str*tion d.cis10n;matt.r should th.n go to the Bo.rd of App.al. <br />for its r.com..ndation to Council. Mulc.hy said Council should <br />~ bav. a c.rtain plan, and. fir. i..ue on which to ..k. a d.ci.ion. <br /> <br />Hicks not.d tbat this motion do.s not prohibit the .pplicant fro. <br />.pplying for. Building P.rmit. <br /> <br />Aftar furtb.r discussion, the motion c.rri.d (Hicka, McAllist.r, <br />Woodburn voting in f.vor of the motion; Christians.n, Mulcahy <br />voting in opposition) (3-2) <br /> <br />REPORT OF VILLAGE,CL!RK ADMINISTRATOR CHARLOTTE McNIESB <br /> <br />P.yroll <br /> <br />Council..vas r.f.rr.d to the Payroll .nd .n .ddition.l ch.ck in the <br />amount of $88.68 for r.tty C.sh. <br /> <br />-5- <br />