CC 06-13-1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . \ Minutes of Regular Council Minutes June 13, 1983 Page Three that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the site plan and building permit with the conditions listed in the - . Planning Commission Minutes (6-1-83). Jack Welsch said he agrees with the site improvement as outlined by the Planning Commission; reported that the Fire Chief said there would be no problem with the increased number of people, and the addition t9 the building as p.oposed. In discussion, Welsch said the incinerdtor will remain in the present location. Fire Chief said this would not be a problem. It was noted that the satellite dish will be located on the roof of the new structure and the new roof line will meet the existing roof line. It was noted that the concensus of the Planning Commission was that the satellite dish would look better on the roof than at its present ground location, if it is screened to the maximum that is feasible. Welsch explained that the existing downstairs room is currently used for private parties only; it will be gone when the addition is built. Welsch said there will be no change in the exterior signage or lighting; existing sign at end of building will be removed. Hicks moved, seconded by Mulcahy, that Council approve the site plan and building permit with the following conditions: 1. re-stripe parking lot according to proposed plan, 2. install post and chain barrier along west and south property lines, 3. screen the dumpster, 4. screen the satellite on the roof to the maximum feasible, 5. existing landscaped area not be reduced. Mo~ion carried unanimously. (5-0) (It was the understanding of Council and Mr. Welsch that the con- tingencies are tied to the occupancy permit of the new addition.) Industrial Revenue Bond Financing - Discussion of Policy Statement and Guidelines Hicks asked Council's position; does Council want to adopt guide- lines? Hicks said he felt if Council does not want to engage in IRB financing, discussion of guidelines is a waste of time. Christiansen said he sees a need for guidelines; Council and developer need to know what it will consid~r, as opposed to an unstructured application for consideration. Woodburn said he sees no reason to put developers through hoops if Council does not intend to entertain IRB financing; sees guidelines as invitational to IRBa. Christiansen moved to table the discussion of guidelines to the next Council meeting (June 27th). Motion was seconded by Mulcahy. In discussion, it waS queried what is gained by tabling the dia- cussion? It was felt more time is needed by Council to review the proposed guidelines prepared by Popovich. Concern was expressed that the current application will be 3delayed. Christiansen said he didn't feel that another two weeks would adversely affect the applicant. Mulcahy noted that Popovich's suggestions and the comments and suggestions of Juran and Moody are serious proposals for Council's consideration and warrant considerable study; suggested a para- graph by paragraph review, noted that all paragrapha are not -3-