Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. , <br />" <br /> <br />improvement for Lexington Avenue from 800 feet north of County <br />Road F - that's the Control Data south driveway, where the <br />present construction project (inaudible) - up to County Road <br />G-2. The primary cost for the project is proposed to be paid <br />for through the County/State aid highway gas tax funds <br />receipts dedicated for Ramsey County. The overall cost of <br />the project, including signals and miscellaneous other aspects <br />of it, is estimated to be $1,700,000 and we feel that the <br />majority of that money, with the exception of approximately <br />$150,000 which we're asking to participate in from the <br />municipalities and another $20,000 from county road and bridge <br />funds set aside for path construction - the remaining portion <br />is proposed to come from the gas tax dollars. <br /> <br />A brief overview of the project - I've papered the wall <br />up here behind the Council with the latest plan. We had a <br />plan up earlier which - some decisions were made on a path. <br />Maybe I should start with that. The plan encompasses both the <br />roadway of the improvement and the construction of the <br />detached bituminous path - eight feet wide from end to end - <br />associated with the path construction. The original plan was <br />here that some of you might have seen - it involved the path. <br />In some places on the east side - we met with path committees, <br />park committees and whatnot in public meetings. The present <br />plan, as being presented here at the public hearing, has the <br />path entirely on the west side, from County Road F to 'County ~ <br />Road G-2, plus the addition of a little bit of path .on the <br />east side in the vicinity of Trunk Highway 96 - from the <br />service road on the south to the shopping center on the north. <br /> <br />Also, there was a second plan which was an intermediate <br />plan that we had here at. an informational meeting, prior to <br />meeting with some homeowners. I don't think you could see <br />that detail in that plan - I do have a detailed plan here for <br />your investigation if you want to look at it. We have <br />shifted the road slightly - just north of Victoria, between <br />Amble and Pleasant Circle - and moved a proposed retaining <br />wall off of private property onto the County Road right-of-way. <br />Also, this present plan reflects - across the low land north <br />of 96, in the vicinity of G-2 - approximately a foot and a <br />half grade raise, which was recommended by the Minnesota <br />Department of Transportation soils section. <br /> <br />So with the exception of those changes and probably some <br />other minor ones that I've overlooked, the plan here then is <br />what has developed out of the prior two plans that we had <br />before you. Basically the concept is still the same. We're <br />proposing a 68 foot roadway at the south end - to continue <br />the existing section that is now under construction to the <br />north driveway of Control Data and there tapering it down <br />into a S2 foot wide section and carrying it through to G-2, <br />with the exception of some widening in the area of 96 to <br />provide left turn pockets and left turn actuations for the <br />signal modification at Trunk Highway 96. <br /> <br />-2- <br />