My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-25-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
08-25-25-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2025 1:54:06 PM
Creation date
8/21/2025 4:53:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — AUGUST 25, 2025 15 <br />Finance Director Yang said it's net amount vs. costs. <br />Councilmember Holden agrees to use the loader until it dies. We always try to put something in <br />there. It could die in two years. She is amazed how many trailers we buy. You should just weld it <br />and put a new bearing in it. We need to keep that in there. <br />Councilmember Rousseau is in favor of using the case loader until it dies. She understands that <br />if it does, we need to have the funds ready to purchase something. She doesn't know how far out <br />you have to order a case loader prior to delivery. She said a fire truck is one or two years. She <br />wondered if there is a long wait for a case loader, like there is with a fire truck. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen isn't sure. His guess would be it would be a <br />6-12 month wait. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said for this discussion, we can put a pause on the timing of the case <br />loader. Staff could bring back a discussion item in March, to get to a set number that we use for <br />equipment replacement. Then we can look at the strategy and timing of the case loader. For now, <br />we can leave it in the 2027 planning. It won't change the discussion for this budget. In March, <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen can do a complete review on the timing and the <br />needs. We can determine an amount that flattens the budget level each year. <br />Mayor Grant said one thing to keep in mind is the 621 case loader is not the only loader down <br />there. We have a 590, as well. Yes, it's a 1-yard bucket but a dump truck is 5-yards. Maybe you <br />have to dump 5 buckets. We can get there. The only other thing the 621 is used for is to push back <br />snow. We usually can push that back with a snow plow, anyway. <br />Councilmember Weber said that is an important factor. We won't be in dire straights if it does <br />break down. We should have one, in the long run. He agrees with keeping it in the long-term plan. <br />He also thinks we should start building for that now. That would mean, if we put away $50,000 a <br />year we can pay for it in 6 years. <br />Councilmember Holden said we should do the planning for that in March. <br />Councilmember Monson agrees that Staff should come back with a plan. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen thought that was the direction to bring it <br />back in March. He will move forward with that. <br />Mayor Grant asked if the 1996 Redi-Haul Trailer is a zero gravity tilt trailer. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen believes all of the trailers are tilt. <br />Mayor Grant doesn't understand why we are getting a new one. We replaced them all because <br />we wanted the gravity tilt. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said ergonomics and safety are the reasons. <br />The other thing to remember is the trade-in value. The "use it until it dies" approach is not ideal. <br />Especially for a City to maintain things that way. When discussing the loader, we did look at used <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.