My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-25-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
08-25-25-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2025 1:54:06 PM
Creation date
8/21/2025 4:53:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — AUGUST 25, 2025 14 <br />Councilmember Holden asked if they pay three quarters of the $8 million. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen clarified that this captures everything. <br />Mayor Grant said the difference of $3.4 million is because the 2034 project got pushed to 2036 <br />and is off the screen. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen confirmed. <br />Councilmember Weber said we are paying an additional $1.2 million dollars for this new project <br />because we are pushing them out for the next 10 years. He pointed out that is just like bonding. <br />We could just bond, do the projects and pay the same amount extra. <br />Councilmember Monson said in the memo it states the levy increase being proposed for the <br />General Fund is $742,866. Police and fire are 54% of our General Levy Fund. She asked how <br />much is the 2026 PMP, percentage -wise. <br />Finance Director Yang said the $3.3 million cost is not just in the PIR Fund. It is the sewer, <br />water and surface water, as well. <br />Councilmember Monson is just trying to determine how much it is broken out. What percent of <br />the levy is fire safety? How much is parks vs. streets? She thinks the operating is broken out. <br />Finance Director Yang said the way the levy works is, we take into account Fund Balance for <br />CIP. She is proposing for CIP, which is the PIR Fund, to not change from the $250,000. If we <br />shift projects, that will ultimately improve the overall Fund Balance. It may not change the Levy. <br />It could change the levy down or up, if we want to. Right now what is being proposed is to remain <br />at $250,000 for 2026. <br />Councilmember Weber said she is proposing to add $50,000 in 2027. <br />Finance Director Yang confirmed. Based on a specific scenario. <br />Finance Director Yang said under equipment the 621 Case loader was shifted from 2026 to <br />2027. That was $300,000. Under vehicles the Ford Escape was shifted from 2026 to 2027. That <br />was $33,500. <br />Councilmember Weber thought there was consensus that we were just going to use the loader <br />until we can't. He asked for clarification that all scenarios of the budget plan include the $300,000 <br />expenditure in 2027 for the end loader. <br />Finance Director Yang confirmed. <br />Councilmember Weber thought there was consensus that the machine will be used until it is no <br />longer usable. He would propose moving it to 2031. We can start now and add an amount into the <br />Equipment Fund so we can get there, by then. <br />Councilmember Holden said the Ford Escape was $41,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.