Laserfiche WebLink
<br />... <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting <br />Village of Arden Hills <br />Monday, November 8, 1982 - 7:30 p.m. <br />Village Hall <br /> <br /> <br />Call to Order <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn called <br />the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Present - Mayor Robert Woodburn, Councilmen Maurice Johnson, <br />Diane McAllister, Dale Hicks, Thomas Mulcahy (7:38 p.m.) <br /> <br />. Absent - None <br /> <br />Also Present - Attorney James Lynden, Engineer Don Christoffersen, <br />Treasurer Donald Lamb, Clerk Administrator Charlotte <br />McNiesh, Deputy Clerk Dorothy Zehm <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br />McAllister moved, seconded by Hicks, that Council approve the <br />Minutes of the October 25th Council Minutes as amended and the <br />Minutes of the November 4th Council Meeting as submitted. Motion <br />carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />Business from the Floor <br />None <br /> <br />(Mulcahy arrived at the meeting). <br /> <br />REPORT OF VILLAGE ATTORNEY JAMES LYNDEN <br /> <br />Amusement Arcade Ordinance Ameudment <br />Council was referred to letter from-Lynden (11-5-82) and Flaherty <br />(11-4-82) relative to Ordinance No. 224. In discussion of license <br />fees, Lynden said he was unaware of Resolution No. 82-41 which <br />establishes fees for amusement arcades and coin operated amuse- <br />ment devices; noted that the fees charged should be commensurate <br />with the cost to administer the licensed activity; suggested an <br />escalating amusement arcade fee, based on the number of devices <br />in the establishment, and a fixed fee per device; suggested that <br />the fees should be in line with other communities. <br /> <br />Jane Lockridge, Hunters Park, expressed concern that the ordinance <br />appears to affect only one business; feels it is unfair to p.lace <br />controls on an existing business operation which seems to please <br />"everyone". It was suggested that perhaps the whole ordinance <br />deals with "evils" that don't exist. <br /> <br />Tim Tuggle said from his son's experience, he could vouch for <br />Flaherty's policing their operation and enforcing the 9:00 p.m. <br />curfew. <br /> <br />In further discussion, it was explained that the controls were <br />. primarily based on concern about activities in and around arcades <br />(e.g. beer drinking in parking lots etc.), also of concern is <br />that minors are operating the machines when they should be in <br />school. Flaherty suggested that young people will congregate <br />most anywhere parking lots, beaches, parks, street corners, <br />shopping centers etc; advised that Flaherty polices its own oper- <br />ation, which is controlled by liquor license regulations and in- <br />vestigation; noted that Flahertys has had game machines for over <br />19 years without any problems. <br /> <br />Hicks moved, seconded by Mulcahy, that Council authorize the <br />changes to Ordinance 224 as suggested iu Lynden's letter of <br />11-5-82, to exclude those establishments having liquor licenses <br />from certain sections of the ordinance, and to modify Section <br />4-12 to regulate hours of operation on school days/nights for per- <br />sons under the age of 16, not accompanied by an adult or guardian. <br />Motion carried (Hicks, Mulcahy, Johnson, McAllister voting in <br />favor of the motion; Woodburn voting in opposition). <br />