My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-01-1982
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
CC 02-01-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:21 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 2:38:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. MARCEL EIBENSTEINER, President of Royal Oaks Realty, <br />Inc., Developer of Royal Hills: First of all, I have another <br />question for Mr. Christoffersen on the storm sewer. The pond <br />has an elevation of 962.2 and the street is at 962.5 - 5/10 <br />off. Why can't I drain the pond onto the street and down the <br />hill without bringing all the expensive storm sewer and catch <br />basins - I'm going to move the whole storm sewer all the way <br />down to the intersection, put in two catch basins and a pipe <br />going down to the lower area, eliminate all the pipe in the <br />intersection and all the way up to the ponding area, let the <br />pond area overflow into the street. It would have to be only <br />5/10 off, otherwise just lower the street another 5/10 and <br />then that pond would drain automatically down to the inter- <br />section. I'm out to save money and I figure I could save <br />$20,000 by eliminating the pipe from the pond to the inter- <br />section. Is it necessary? <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: Yes, I believe it's necessary. This <br />is roughly the area of the pond that. we're talking about and <br />currently your street is coming in in this location, roughly <br />in this vicinity, which will block part of the pond. You can <br />see the natural drainage area that follows down through this <br />area. It essentially drains down this way, down into a lower <br />area. As this develops, obviously there will be a road sitting <br />there as somewhat of a dam. It's not good practice to have <br />water pond to the side, raised to an elevation that would slop <br />over the curb into the street. That's not good practice. <br />Another consideration could be - and we thought of this, but <br />obviously we don't know the complete answer until we get into <br />the design phase - it could be possible to create some fill to <br />raise the bottom of this pond to where it's not holding water <br />and the water runs off into that. low area, similar to the way <br />water would run off of a lawn. That's acceptable. But to have <br />water fill up in the pond and then slop over into the street <br />that's unacceptable. <br /> <br />MR. EIBENSTEINER: How about if I fill it up? <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: We don't know at this point in time. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: The question arises - what is "it"? <br /> <br />MR. EIBENSTEINER: Fill the pond. I think if I filled <br />it in, it would only have a depth of about two feet. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: That could be. As I say, I'd <br />rather have . . . <br /> <br />MR. EIBENSTEINER: <br /> <br />(Inaudible) fill it in to two feet <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />. . . <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: (Inaudible) some elevations on the <br />street. We don't have any complete data. We're still working <br />with preliminary information right now. Rather than to not <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.