My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-01-1982
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
CC 02-01-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:21 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 2:38:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />> <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: The intent is not to really drain the <br />pond dry. The intent is to provide overflow for the pond. <br />Currently the pond rises about two to three feet before it flows <br />naturally down to this area. It's just developed and graded <br />to make somewhat of a dam across here and the water would rise <br />higher in the pond and, as you well know, oak trees cannot <br />survive high water. So the intent is to put a control here <br />so the water will not reach a high level. <br /> <br />MRS. SUE HUSTINGS: Because of the artificial homes that <br />are going into the area - you're trying to save the trees. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: We're just trying to protect this so <br />that it doesn't reach an unusually high level. <br /> <br />MRS. SUE HUSTINGS: Also, I was wondering why the alterna- <br />tive plan, with the cul-de-sac, is in the park rather than on <br />private property. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: That was at the direction of the <br />Council - to show an alternative or cul-de-sac through the <br />park. <br /> <br />MRS. SUE HUSTINGS: Wouldn't it also be possible to have <br />an alternative on private property rather than on public <br />property? That is a possibility even though it isn't there? <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: It's possible. <br /> <br />MRS. SUE HUSTINGS: Also, it was stated that there were <br />18 divisions of this $247,000. I can see 16. Where are the <br />other two? <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: The other two potential lots were <br />just east of Lot 10 along this road. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: We don't have the planner here to answer <br />some of these questions and I don't really like to answer too <br />many of them (inaudible). Those two alternatives were thought <br />to be the most feasible by the Council and the two to look at <br />first. The reason was to provide access into the park- better <br />access for people. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MRS. SUE HUSTINGS: I did talk to John Buckley and he <br />said it isn't important to get access to this neighborhood <br />park - that that was not one of the things that the Park <br />Department felt was important. Therefore, he feels that <br />(inaudible). I would like to be on record that that is not <br />something that the Park Committee has wanted. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: We are aware of that, and the former <br />statements still stand. Does anyone want to briefly add to <br />the answer ,to that question since we don't have a professional <br />answer? Any more comments? <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.