My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-01-1982
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
CC 02-01-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:21 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 2:38:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />subtract that from the 28, you'd have six feet. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. TUGGLE: l~ich is narrower than a car. I know you <br />can't do it because there are cars parked along there and you <br />have to wait for the oncoming car to go by before you can go. <br />This is in the summer too. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: Village standards on improved streets <br />are 34 feet. <br /> <br />MR. TUGGLE: Does that mean they're going to widen Floral <br />Drive? <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: That's up to the Council. <br /> <br />MR. DELBERT JOHNSON, 1359 Colleen Avenue: I see a very <br />emotional issue before you. I don't see any real solution, <br />like a number of people are stating, to the problem. We have <br />children and access to the park. We appreciate Floral Park, <br />we don't want to damage Floral Park, nor do we want any of our <br />kids to be injured going to Floral Park. An increased traffic <br />flow on Colleen Avenue is a risk to our children getting to <br />Floral Park - we have the same problems you people have. We <br />have the same common goal - safety. That's one thing. But now <br />we have an economic issue involved and they're talking about <br />$247,000, plus widening Floral Drive. In Everett Dirkson's <br />terms, a billion dollars here and billion dollars there, pretty <br />soon you're starting to talk about real money. Maybe we're <br />starting to talk about real money here now. All of these con- <br />siderations, someone is obviously going to have to pay for them. <br /> <br />RITA SCHUNICHT, 1469 Colleen Avenue: I have a couple of <br />questions. First of all, as far as the assessments for the <br />road through the park - I'm wondering who would pay for that <br />and I'm wondering if it would make a difference if the people <br />on Colleen Avenue would express a desire to help with that, <br />considering that we are paying for something that will benefit <br />us in terms of reduced traffic. My other question is - <br />regarding the traffic on Floral and Hamline - ~ believe there <br />was something brought up last time about another alternative <br />for helping to ease that. I'm wondering if we could have that <br />repeated. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: There are 18 lots that would be benefitted <br />and they would be the ones that would be assessed for this. <br />Unless the City Council put some of it on general taxes - <br />then you would get more than Colleen - you'd get the rest of <br />the City as part of the project. Is Colleen in the assessment <br />area? <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: No. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: <br />either, so there's <br />lots and then some <br /> <br />They're not in the area that was published <br />no way we can say we'll put some on the 18 <br />on the other ones, because they were never <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.