My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-11-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
08-11-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2025 9:05:10 AM
Creation date
9/9/2025 9:05:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—AUGUST 11, 2025 3 <br /> approximately $500,000. He requested staff provide the City Council with further information on <br /> the TCAAP development professional charge that was written into the fee schedule. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe stated she would provide the Council with further information on this <br /> fee. <br /> Mayor Grant inquired if the County or the City would be paying for the trail. He explained he <br /> would like the City to be reimbursed if the City paid this expense. He stated the trunk utilities and <br /> sub-trunk utilities were to be constructed when a development site is approved by the JDA and <br /> the developer was to participate in the extension of the public improvements. He read further <br /> language within the JPA and asked if the County was acting as the developer at this time. <br /> Councilmember Monson stated the JDA spoke about this topic at their last meeting and staff <br /> would be investigating this further. <br /> Mayor Grant reported that the JPA states that if the County wants to put a road in prior to <br /> development occurring, the Council would have to agree to this. <br /> Councilmember Weber stated it was his understanding an agreement had to be reached between <br /> the prospective developer and the JDA. <br /> Councilmember Monson commented she would like further information from the JDA attorney <br /> on this matter. <br /> Mayor Grant believed it would benefit both the City and the County to go by the language <br /> within the JPA and as this moves forward that this language be clearly defined for both parties. <br /> He recommended a new planning effort be considered for the TCAAP site and suggested this <br /> topic be brought to the JDA. He reported if the City were to pursue this, he wanted to be assured <br /> the City would be reimbursed for this work. <br /> Councilmember Weber reported the City being reimbursed was a very high priority to him. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated the City Council spent almost a year making sure the JPA was as <br /> clear as possible and the Mayor was bringing up this concern to ensure the City was properly <br /> protected and that the City's costs were being reimbursed. She questioned if the developer had a <br /> timeline for the other 32 acres within the thumb parcels. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe indicated she would have to verify the purchase and sale agreement <br /> timeline. <br /> Mayor Grant reported he was of the opinion now was the time for the Council to be asking <br /> questions regarding TCAAP, even if these questions were difficult to answer. He requested a <br /> copy of the JPA be placed in the next JDA packet. <br /> Councilmember Monson clarified for the record that she has read the JPA but indicated she did <br /> not have it in front of her at this time so she could not review it at this moment. She suggested the <br /> JPA be provided to the City Council in a packet for future reference. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau explained she would like to receive a copy of the JPA. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.