CC 05-13-1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I . I- I . . I . I I. I I I I I . I .. . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MAY 13. 1996 o J Mr, Fritsinger stated that at the April 29, 1996, City Council meeting, the Council Approved Resolution Numbers 96-25 and 96-27, relating to the 1996 Street Improvement Project and the Old Highway 10 Watermain Project. Mr. Fritsinger explained that within the two resolutions are statements scheduling the time, date, and location for the two public hearings related to these projects. He stated that Staff has clarified the location for the May 28, 1996 meeting must be changed to the New Brighton Family Services Center, because of the conflict of the New Brighton City Council using their chambers for a New Brighton City Council Meeting at that time, Mr. Fritsinger stated the City Attorney, Jerry Filla, has recommended the Council first move to amend Council action taken at the April 29, 1996, meeting to approve the resolution, then move to adopt the revised resolutions, stating the correct time and location of the public hearings, Mayor Probst clarified that the public hearing notices sent contain the correct date, time, and location, MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to amend Resolutions # 96-25 and #96-27, Adopting Resolutions Relating to the Old Highway 10 Watermain and 1996 Street Improvement Project Assessment Hearings, The motion carried unanimously (5-0), MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to adopt Resolutions #96-25a and #96-27a, Amending Previously Adopted Resolutions Relating to the Old Highway 10 Watermain and 1996 Street Improvement Project Assessment Hearings Meeting Location. The motion carried unanimously (5-0), C. Adopt Resolution #96-30. Supportinl! Cooperative Participation in the North Metro 35W Corridor Coalition Mr, Fritsinger stated that City Staff has been meeting with representatives of the cities of Shoreview, New Brighton, Mounds View and Roseville, for the purpose of discussing issues which affect each community and considering alternatives for creating a strategic alliance to address the issues ofthe 35W Corridor. Mr. Fritsinger stated the issues related to transportation, housing, polluted site clean-up, and commercial and industrial development. He continued that other topics included GIS, lobbying, financial assistance, and CDBG funding, and may include broader subjects such as marketing development opportunities within the corridor, and the Livable Communities Act. Mr. Fritsinger stated there is no financial commitment to participate in the coalition, and that the benefit to participating in the coalition is the strength in numbers it provides,