Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />.. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />.. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />.e <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MAY 13. 1996 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated the 35W Corridor Coalition is a good idea, and inquired if other <br />cities are adopting a similar resolution, Mr. Fritsinger stated that two other cities are adopting <br />similar resolutions this week. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that he has spoken with the mayors of the corridor cities except Roseville, <br />and all are very interested in pursuing the coalition, He stated that the transportation issues on <br />35W will be significant, as it is going to impact all the cities along the corridor. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Hicks moved and Keim seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #96-30, <br />Supporting Cooperative Participation in the North Metro 35W Corridor Coalition. <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0), <br /> <br />D. Adopt Resolution #96-31. Accepting Donation of Property at 1400 Indian Oaks <br />Court <br /> <br />Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director, reviewed tor the Council that Ms. Sandra <br />Welton, 1409 Indian Oaks Court, is requesting the City to accept her donation of property at <br />1400 Indian Oaks Court, He stated the property contains a pond which services the drainage <br />needs of the general neighborhood, He stated Ms, Welton resides on a separate lot which is <br />directly south of the subject property, and will not be affected by the proposed donation with <br />respect to setbacks, lot size, etc, <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald stated Ms, Welton is requesting the City to accept her donation, as the general <br />public benefits by the surface water management and aesthetic qualities provided by the pond. <br />He stated Ms, Welton will be responsible for the taxes which may be due prior to the Warranty <br />Deed being recorded, <br /> <br />Mayor Probst inquired how the pond was planned on a private lot, and not platted as an outlot. <br /> <br />Mr, Ringwald stated the plat originally showed the parcel as an outlot, and that he was unsure of <br />why or when it was changed to a lot. He stated the land is obviously undevelopable, and should <br />have remained an outlot, <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks inquired of the depth of the pond, Mr. Ringwald stated he did not know <br />the depth of the pond, <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks inquired if fencing or other means of safety measures would need to be <br />installed, as the City may have a legal responsibility to protect children from the entering the <br />pond, <br />