Laserfiche WebLink
FINANCIAL CONTEXT - STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> For the 2002-03 biennium, state spending from all funds is projected to be $39.3 billion. • <br /> Spending from the General Fund is expected to be $26.2 billion, based on current planning <br /> estimates. (These numbers will be updated in a forecast available the end of this month.) <br /> Four programs are projected to account for 77% of General Fund spending: <br /> • $8.6 billion for K-12 Education (33%) <br /> • $4.5 billion for Health Care (17%) <br /> • $3.5 billion for Property Tax Aids and Credits (13%) <br /> • $2.8 billion for Higher Education (11%) <br /> The Governor's interest in limiting the rate of growth in state expenditures to that of inflation <br /> suggests careful planning for these spending areas that comprise more than two-thirds of the <br /> state budget. That goal cannot be attained unless it is applied to these "budget drivers" as <br /> well. <br /> In fact, three of these areas ( K-12 education, health care, and property tax aids and credits) <br /> have grown at a rate that far exceeds the rate of inflation. From the last biennium to the <br /> current biennium, all three of these areas grew by about 20% or more. <br /> From the current biennium to the next, based on current law, these areas are again projected <br /> to grow at a rate that far exceeds the expected rate of inflation with health care topping the <br /> list at a rate of growth of almost 26%. <br /> Current planning estimates indicate that covering the costs of existing programs and <br /> addressing inflationary pressures results in spending increases that exceed the rate of <br /> inflation and may leave high priority programs inadequately addressed. Examining the • <br /> effectiveness and priority of current state programs in an effort to appropriately reallocate <br /> funds from lower to higher priorities will be a critical element in the development of the <br /> budget. <br /> Clearly, taxpayers fund not only state programs, but local public expenditures as well. They <br /> are largely indifferent to the complex relationships between government jurisdictions, but do <br /> care about how much of their income is needed to support government spending. It's <br /> estimated that in 2002 about 17.2 cents out of every household dollar will be needed to <br /> support state and local government expenditures. The Ventura Administration will closely <br /> monitor this "price of government" indicator to ensure that we are not solving state budget <br /> pressures by simply shifting costs to local government, and that there is appropriate <br /> consideration of how government spending should be affected by changing economic <br /> conditions at all levels of government. <br /> According to State Auditor and DOR, local government revenue sources vary significantly. <br /> Local Property State General State Categorical Other Local <br /> Local Government Tax Aid Aid Revenue Sources <br /> Counties (99) 37% 6% 23% 33% <br /> Cities >2500 (00) 29% 21% 5% 45% <br /> Cities <2500 (00) 31% 33% 3% 32% <br /> School Districts (DOR) 25% 54% 12% 9% <br /> Contact: Patti Marquardt, MN Department of Finance—651-297-3616 <br /> patricia.marquardt@state.mn.us 10-Nov-00 <br />