My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 05-28-1996
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CC 05-28-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:22 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 2:48:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />.e <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL- MAY 28.1996 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Mr. Levander also inquired about street access during the construction period. Mr. <br />Stonehouse replied that construction will include grinding of the existing bituminous, rolling, <br />and packing. He stated there will be brief times during the day when there will be no access, <br />but will always be access at the beginning and end of the day and 24-hour emergency access. <br /> <br />Ronald Christianson, 1438 Arden Oaks Court, submitted a letter objecting to the <br />assessment because he is being assessed for the street portion that his back yard borders on <br />Pascal Avenue, which is of no benefit to him. Mayor Probst explained that Mr. <br />Christianson's total assessment cost was not calculated as a gross amount of all property <br />borders but was a net figure and then adjusted. He noted that part of the construction will <br />include a significant improvement to the drainage problem, and will benefit Mr. Christianson. <br /> <br />Mr. Stonehouse explained that Mr. Christianson's assessment was calculated as a weighted <br />difference, combined, then reduced. <br /> <br />Mr. Steve Herbst, 3799 McCracken Lane, submitted a letter for the record to Mr. <br />Fritsinger. He stated he objected to the front foot calculation of 127 feet, He stated he lives <br />on the corner of McCracken Lane, and his front footage is really 91.4 feet. He stated the <br />majority of his neighbors were assessed a lesser amount. Mr. Herbst showed a graphic of his <br />lot with easements over 30 percent of his lot, rendering it unusable. <br /> <br />Mr. Andrew Kuehn, 3581 Ridgewood Road, stated that due to the position of his home he <br />is being assessed higher than his neighbors, but has no objection if the drainage problem is <br />corrected. Mr. Stonehouse stated the drainage problem will indeed be corrected. <br /> <br />David Barnier, 1624 Chatham Avenue, inquired if the 135.76 front foot calculation is the <br />entire lot. He stated he has already paid the Chatham Avenue assessment. Mr. Stonehouse <br />replied that this calculation is the McCracken assessment. <br /> <br />Mr. Barnier stated there is no storm drainage outside of the right-of-way, only subsurface <br />drainage. Mr. Stonehouse stated he would have to review and see if something can be done to <br />correct the drainage problem there, as he was unaware of it. <br /> <br />Mr. Jim Johnson, 1535 Lake Johanna Boulevard, read a letter into the record stating his <br />objection to the assessment. <br /> <br />Mr. Charlie Roach, 1628 Oak Avenue, inquired about the method of calculation of front <br />footage. He stated he is being assessed at 155 feet, while his lot is actually 115. Mr. <br />Stonehouse stated that a recalculation had already been done for Mr. Roach's lot at 148.75, <br />which decreased the assessment amount by $200. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.