Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> - <br />I <br />I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 30. 1996 8 <br />,. how to improve Highway 96. Mayor Probst noted this is the City's "one-shot" to improve this <br /> segment of roadway which the City needs to receive in the best condition as possible. He <br /> pointed out that part of the problem with the I-35W improvement is property acquisition and <br />I commented on the importance of making the correct decision based on the long-range plan and <br /> betterment of the entire community. Mayor Probst stated the Council needs more details to be <br /> able to make that determination. <br />I Mr. Tolaas stated it appears the alternate plan has strong issues on both sides and should be <br />I addressed in the environmental study. He advised that Ramsey County will carry both <br /> alternatives forward for further considcration. <br />I Councilmember Aplikowski asked if construction plans can be revised to eliminate the relocation <br /> aspect. Mr. Tolaas advised there is not enough area to avoid displacement <br />I Wendy Kolb, 1851 Todd Drive, stated her belief that the added noise or sound barriers will take <br /> away from her lot. <br />I Mayor Probst pointed out that traffic will increase whether the roadway is improved or not and <br /> noise will be an issue. <br />.. Cowlcilmember Aplikowski advised she owns two mobile home parks in New Brighton and has <br /> had to struggled with these same issues. She stated she understands the difficulty in being <br /> displaced but believes the end result will be a nicer and more liveable community. <br />I Councilmember Aplikowski stated homeowners will be handled carefully and this may be an <br /> opportunity to end up with something better. She stated she supports a "win-win" situation and <br />I urged residents to look at this as a new opportunity. <br /> Mayor Probst stated Ramsey County will continue to carry this option as a possibility. The <br />I EA W will be available later this week and a decision will not be made without more input from <br /> resi dents. <br />I Mr. Neilson requested Ramsey County consider an alternative to eliminating the bicycle path and <br /> narrow medians. Mayor Probst stated the Council will continue to consider all alternatives <br /> identified by Ramsey County and will discuss the trail and frontage road. He asked residents to <br />I keep in mind the broader issues as they relate to them, their children, and the greater community <br /> as well. Mayor Probst agreed that this is a difficult segment of roadway and his interest is to <br /> make sure it is done as well as possible and to lessen impacts as much as possible. <br />I Councilmember Malone inquircd regarding the next check-point. Mr. Tolaas advised ofthe final <br /> design process on this segment (once the 1997 construction program is defined) and their intent <br />I to further look at the type of compensation available to impacted residents. <br />,. It was noted there may be two residents who did not receive a copy of the relocation manual. <br /> Mr. Tolaas stated he will provide those copies and schedule meetings with residents to discuss <br /> the relocation program and how value will be determined. <br />I <br />