Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I <br /> I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - DECEMBER 9.1996 7 <br /> II and then make the decision on which streets to include and the scope of the project based on how <br /> the bids are received. <br /> I Councilmember Malone concurred with regard to the Council's fiduciary responsibility and <br /> askcd about a cold in-place recycling option. Mr. Stonehouse explained that due to subgrade <br /> I soils and drainage issues, cold in-place recycling is not the most effective means and he would <br /> recommend against that option. <br /> I Council member Aplikowski stated she understands resident's desire to maintain a rural look <br /> without curb and gutter but since the City has adopted a pavement management guideline, it has <br /> been determined that curbs are needed to maintain streets. She supported doing as much as <br /> I possible and if snow storage on Snelling A venue is a problem, it can be addressed. <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski stated she would like to keep as many roads in the program as the <br /> I City can afford. With regard to speeding, she commented it is a personal responsibility problem <br /> and each of us needs to be aware of the speed we are traveling. <br /> I MOTION: Keirn moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #96-67, <br /> Authorizing Preparation of Detailed Plans and Specifications in the Matter of the <br /> 1997 Street Improvement Project, including the option of reconstruction of <br /> Ie Colleen Circle, and keeping in mind there may be a need to reduce the scope to <br /> remove Hamline and Snelling Avenues. <br /> I Councilmember Malone again reviewed the project schedule and advised the Council will <br /> consider the engineer's plans and specifications on January 27, 1997, with the bids to be opened <br /> on February 27,1997, and the assessment hearing held on March 31,1997. Mr. Stonehouse <br /> I stated to assure public input, a newsletter will be sent within two weeks regarding when the <br /> engineer will be viewing each street so residents can specifically address their concerns. <br /> I The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> I APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> November 25,1996, Regular Council Meeting <br /> I Page 3, last paragraph, "He stated he understands this type of food establishment is <br /> being requested by the applicant but the need also exists to assure orderly <br /> I development." <br /> Page 4, first paragraph, "Councilmember Malone stated in reviewing the five <br /> I criteria, he believes the proposal is not the type of development that is desirable <br /> since it does not currently meet the "test" for the use of the proDerty." <br /> .. <br /> I <br />