My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-03-25 PC Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2025
>
09-03-25 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2025 2:45:11 PM
Creation date
10/2/2025 2:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 of 14 <br /> <br />Lot Size: 1622: 0.101 acres/4,415 square feet <br />1624: 0.091 acres/3,957 square feet <br /> <br />The Subject Property is located on the north side of Lake Johanna, south of Lake Johanna Blvd. <br />The two lots are riparian lots abutting Lake Johanna and are subject to applicable Shoreland <br />Regulations under Zoning Code Section 1330. The property at 1622 Lake Johanna Blvd is <br />developed with a single-family residential dwelling while the Subject Property at 1624 Lake <br />Johanna Blvd is a vacant lot that is owned by the same property owner. <br /> <br />Minnesota Statute has specific rules for shoreland lots. Small shoreland lots created before the <br />adoption of local shoreland ordinances are often not suitable for the size and intensity of <br />contemporary lakeshore development. The nonconforming lot provisions in the shoreland rules <br />(Minnesota Rules 6120.3300 subp. 2(D)) work to bring nonconforming shoreland lots into <br />conformance over time. <br /> <br />According to statute, an individual nonconforming lot that is part of a contiguous group of lots <br />under common ownership must be considered a separate parcel for sale or development, if: <br />1. The lot is at least 66% of lot area and width requirements in Minnesota Rule, part <br />6120.3300, subp. 2a; <br />2. The lot is connected to a public sewer or a Type 1 sewage system; <br />3. The impervious surface does not exceed 25%; and <br />4. The development is consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />If the lot does not meet all of these criteria, the lot must be combined with one or more of the <br />contiguous lots so they equal a conforming lot as much as possible. <br /> <br />The proposed new development on the Subject Property would not meet criterion number three, <br />as the proposed impervious surface coverage exceeds 25 percent. Therefore, per the state rules, the <br />1622 lot must be combined with the 1624 Lake Johanna Blvd lot so they equal a conforming lot <br />as much as possible. However, per the City Zoning Code, the proposed lot area after the lots are <br />consolidated would be less than the minimum required lot area established for parcels zoned R-1 <br />and developed as single family residential properties as well as the minimum required lot area <br />established for riparian lots for general development waters. A variance from the City’s <br />requirements is required for the proposed development. <br /> <br />3. Proposed Use <br /> <br />The Applicant is proposing to demolish the existing structure and rebuild a 2,877 square foot <br />single-family dwelling with an attached garage on the Subject Property. To construct the new <br />dwelling with the proposed footprint, the Applicant is requesting to first consolidate the two <br />parcels into one residential parcel. The new dwelling would then be constructed on the <br />consolidated parcel. <br /> <br />The Applicant, who is the architect of the proposed dwelling and represents the Property Owner, <br />states that the variances are requested to allow for a new home that will be in keeping with the <br />other lakeshore neighborhood homes. The narrative states that the existing dwelling sustained <br />extensive damage throughout the home recently due to a burst pipe. A contractor was hired to <br />make repairs but they ultimately damaged other parts of the first floor level. Faced with repairing <br />the damage, the Property Owner has chosen to rebuild. As part of the rebuild, he has elected to <br />expand the footprint of the dwelling. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.