Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL — SEPTEMBER 29, 2025 4 <br />Councilmember Monson commented on the budget assumptions as presented by staff. She <br />reported the City Council invested significantly in its staff and union negotiations were completed <br />last year. She reported the budget included a 19% increase for police and a 17.6% increase for <br />fire. She indicated there was nothing the Council could do to reduce these expenditures. She <br />stated this Council has been in discussion on how to properly fund the PIR Fund and how to fix <br />the shortfalls over the next five years. She stated it is complicated. She then explained the City <br />had to put additional funding into the PIR Fund in order to fund it effectively over the next 10 <br />years. She discussed how the Council was working to have 50% of the general fund set aside in <br />reserves, noting she would like to see this fund increasing by the amount of inflation every year. <br />She indicated her goal was to properly invest in the City to fund expenses that would be incurring <br />both now and into the future. She appreciated Council Rousseau putting the dollar amounts into <br />context and found that helpful for the public. She stated she was interested in using the excess <br />franchise fees ($165,000) to cover the new fire costs. She explained Council has discussed the <br />various scenarios and dollar amounts at previous work sessions and that Councilmember Holden <br />had stated at a work session that we need to look at 19%. She said the Council has known for a <br />while the levy was going to be high. She indicated she supports targeting one of the first three <br />levy amounts. <br />Councilmember Rousseau stated she would be interested in looking at the higher of the first <br />three levy amounts with the understanding the amount could always be brought down. She <br />commented on how costs could continue to rise in 2026 due to tariffs and purchasing a fire truck, <br />and stated she believed it would be better to set the preliminary levy at a higher level. <br />Mayor Grant explained the Council was looking to pay more attention to the PIR Fund. He <br />indicated he would support one of the first two scenarios when it comes to the levy. <br />Councilmember Monson asked if staff had any information regarding health benefits. <br />Finance Director Yang explained the estimated increases were 15% for health insurance and 4% <br />for dental. She indicated the Minnesota Paid Leave was at a preliminary amount that could <br />change. <br />Councilmember Weber inquired if the proposed budget would cover last year's debt. <br />Finance Director Yang reported this was the case, as the scenarios she had brought forward <br />assumes a balanced budget. <br />Councilmember Weber questioned how staff was proposing to utilize the excess franchise fees <br />in 2026. <br />Finance Director Yang stated she was proposing a transfer to the general fund to offset public <br />safety costs. <br />Mayor Grant explained he supported the Council moving forward with the first option given the <br />estimated strong revenues for 2025. He commented he was concerned with how the County and <br />School District levies would adversely impact residents, on top of a large increase for the City. <br />Councilmember Rousseau stated she supported keeping the levy high in order to properly put <br />funding back towards the fire department. <br />