My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
10-13-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2025 8:31:51 AM
Creation date
10/9/2025 4:07:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL — SEPTEMBER 29, 2025 5 <br />Councilmember Weber indicated he was inclined to agree with this recommendation. He <br />discussed how there was a projected shortfall in the PIR Fund and noted the Council needs to <br />further investigate the extent of the shortfall. He stated he could support directing the excess <br />franchise fees towards fire department expenditures for next year. However, this was just a band - <br />aid unless the Council intended to direct the excess franchise fees to excess fire expenditures <br />every year. He explained he supported the proposed PIR Fund increases in order to properly fund <br />City projects in the future. <br />Councilmember Monson stated it was her understanding it was not beneficial to use the <br />$165,000 in excess franchise fees to pay down the bond until after year 10. She explained staff <br />was proposing to transfer the excess franchise fees into the general fund in order to cover public <br />safety personnel costs. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the impact of using the franchise fees for paying for fire <br />expenses versus using these funds to pay down debt. <br />Councilmember Weber commented he believed using the excess franchise fees for fire <br />expenditures was in keeping with the Council's intentions for the franchise fees. He explained he <br />preferred to set the preliminary levy higher, noting there was an opportunity to bring the levy <br />down. <br />Councilmember Weber excused himself from the meeting at 8:25 p.m. <br />Mayor Grant indicated if the $165,000 in excess franchise fees were used this year, it would not <br />cover the cost of increases in 2027. He stated in 15 years the franchise fee would expire and the <br />levy would then have to increase or the City would have to renew the franchise fee. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a <br />motion to adopt Resolution 2025-063 Setting the Preliminary Lew at 18.32% <br />for Taxes Payable in 2026. <br />Mayor Grant stated he supported the preliminary levy amount being set at 16.99%. <br />A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried 2-1 (Mayor Grant opposed). <br />MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a <br />motion to adopt Resolution 2025-064 Adopting Truth in Taxation Public <br />Hearing Date for Proposed Taxes Payable in 2026 for December 8, 2025. The <br />motion carried (3-0). <br />MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a <br />motion to adopt Resolution 2025-065 Appropriating Funds to Pay Debt <br />Service on the City's General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, <br />Series 2025A, and Authorizing Cancellation of the 2025 Debt Service Levy <br />Related to Such Bonds. The motion carried (3-0). <br />7. COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.