Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> Minutea of the Regular Council Meeting, December 8, 1986 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Hicks asked the applicant what material he proposed for the improvement of the <br /> roadway. <br /> Mark Anderson stated he is proposing to use gravel on the roadway I he has not <br /> explored the costa for paving the road at this tima. <br /> Hicka noted it would be more difficult to control water runnins down a gravel <br /> roadway than a paved street. <br /> Hicks moved, seconded by &an.en, that Council approve Case No. 86-38, Minor <br /> SUbdiVision, subject tal <br /> . 1. The applicant submittins proof of the status of the easement and it's <br /> review by the City Attorney. <br /> 2. The applicant beinS responaible for installation, includins all costs, of <br /> utility services to the lots. The desisn of th.s. services shsll ..et <br /> City standarda and shall be approved by the City Engineer if the <br /> applicant elects to dedicate them to the City for future maintenance. <br /> 3. The spplicant is reeponsible for construction and subsequent owners are <br /> responsible for the maintenance of the access driveway. <br /> 4. The applicant aubmittins a resistered survey for City adminiatrative <br /> approval prior to recording tha subdivision. <br /> 5. The City Ensineer approving driveway plan that addresses the potential <br /> drainage problem. <br /> In discussion, the question was raised regarding City responsibility in the <br /> event the applicant constructs the road and dedicates maintenance of the <br /> utilities to the CitYI who would bear the costs of road repair should the City <br /> find it necessary to aervice the utilities. It was suggested that the City <br /> Attorney review the propoaed application for any unforeseen conditions which <br /> may affect the City. <br /> Sather suggested the motion should include a condition for the applicant <br /> submitting documented status of the easement and subsequent review by the the <br /> City Attorney and that the City Attorney draft a covenant for the lots which <br /> includes installation and subsequent maintenance of utility services and those <br /> further would have to be approved by the Engineer in terma of their design and <br /> function. . <br /> Mayor Woodburn agreed. but suggested the applicant draft the agreement <br /> including the items mentioned by Sather, for review by the City Attorney. <br /> Hicks moved to ~d the motion, seconded by Sather, adding the followins: <br /> Under Item Ill, after Attorney: "and the finding that the access is Pllrmanent <br /> and unrestricted. <br /> 6. The City Engineer review and advise Council regarding driveway and <br /> utility plans. <br /> 7. Covenants neceasary for maintenance of the proposed driveway and utility <br /> installations, to be discussed by Council at a future meet ins, pending <br /> City Engineer's review and recommendation to the Council. <br /> In discussion, it wa~ noted this matter would come before Council at a future <br /> time for clarification on the easement, utility installation, maintenance of <br /> . the roadway and utilities and drainage issue. <br /> Amended motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> Original motion as amended carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> Case No. 86-37. Site Plan Review for Conversion of Shaw Lumber Site to Public <br /> Hall Use. 3776 Connelly Avenue - Louis Walsh <br /> Council waa referred to Planner's memorandum (11-25-86) and Planning Commission <br /> Minutes (12-3'86). <br /> _. __n_ <br />