CC 06-09-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, June 9 Page 6 Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that the Council permit a 48 s.f. temporary sign at 1-694. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Hansen moved, seconded by Hicks, that Council approve a 48 s.f. temporary sign at Red Fox Road, at the proposed location, to be removed at 95% occupancy of the building. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Case No. 86-22, Setback Variances for Project Monument SiRns - Northpark _ Business Center, Jim Durda . Miller reported that the signage plan has been approved for Northpark Business Center, assuming no variances; reported that 9' setback variances are now being requested for the two entrance monuments 16' from the right-of-way lines (25' . required). Miller reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the setback variance for both signs because the berming required to shield parked cars, a grade differential, and the intensive landscaping, may partially block the signs. Miller reported that the Board of Appeals recommends denial of the setback variance for the sign on Grey Fox Road, because the same conditions do not exist at this location. Miller noted that the proposed 9' variance positions the sign at about 16' from the curb, a comparable setback as the sign at County Road E. Hansen moved, seconded by Hicks, that Council approve the 9' setback variance for the sign at STH 51. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Hicks moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve the 9' setback variance for the sign at Grey Fox Road. Hansen noted that when cars are parked on the street, a sign would be hard to see; feels a variance is in order at this location. Motion carried (Hicks, Peck, Sather, Hansen voting in favor of the motion; Woodburn voting in opposition). (4-1) Case No. 86-8, Setback Variance from SnellinR Avenue. 3332 Lametti Circle, Charles and Carole Kelly Council was referred to Planning memo (5/29/86), minutes of Planning Commission (6/4/86) and Board of Appeals report (5/29/86). Miller explained that the lot has frontage on 3 streets, requiring a 40' setback from all three right-of-way lines; noted that this reduces the building envelope to 55' x 54', which is unusual in this area, and somewhat restrictive; noted that the developer of the plat was made aware of this when plat was proposed. Miller noted that the Snelling Avenue right-of-way is very wide (about 200' in this area) and the lot line is about 75' from the street edge; reported that two 8' setback variances were previously granted at Snelling and Bussard Court based on topography, which is not an issue in this situation. Miller reported that the Board of Appeals and Planning Commission recommend approval. Charles Kelly said they have worked with the architect; reported that the lot topography is not suitable for a tuck-under garage; have tried to utilize the lot with the restrictions of the three 40' setbacks; house would be too high with a tuck-under garage; noted that their proposed house is 70' x 35'. . Miller reported that a visual alignment along the Snelling Avenue frontag~ will probably never be made because of the heavy tree growth; suspects the sight lines will not be noticeable. Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve the 15' setback variance from Snelling Avenue right-of-way because of the building envelope restrictions, wide Snelling right-of-way, a 3 frontage lot, and variance will not adversely impact on the neighborhood. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Case No. 86-17, Setback Variance from Chatham Avenue - 3707 Chatham Court, Terry and Stephanie Mitchell Miller explained that the setback requirement from Chatham Avenue was 20 feet when the existing house was constructed; noted that a 30' setback is now