CC 06-09-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- . . .. Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, June 9 Page 7 required from both streetsona corner lot in the Chatham area. A transparency of the existing house was shown, indicating the proposed family room addition at the 25' setback of the existing house. Miller reported that the Board of Appeals and the Planning Commission recommend approval, as proposed, based on the ordinance change after house was constructed and no neighborhood impact. Miller reported that the applicant has submitted statements from his neighbors, all of whom favor the proposed addition. Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council grant the 5 foot setback variance for the family room addition based on the change of ordinance requirements and no adverse impact on the neighborhood. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Case No. 86-19. Setback Variance from Old HiRhway 10 - 4477 Old HiRhway 10, Conrad Beaulieu Council was referred to a transparency of the Beaulieu lot and existing house, noting the proposed addition. Miller reported that the Board of Appeals and Planning Commission recommend approval of the 2' front setback variance for the addition because the addition does not encroach into the required front setback as far as a portion of the existing house, which is at a 37' setback (40' required) . Hicks moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve the 2' front yard setback for the proposed addition, as proposed. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Replacement of ExistinR Ham Radio Tower - 3538 Siems Court. RORer Moerke Woodburn explained that Council should determine whether the changes proposed represent a "new" or "old" use; noted that if the changes are considered to be "significant", a public hearing and Special Use Permit will be required. Miller explained that the applicant is requesting modification of his existing ham radio antenna; noted that the existing antenna was erected prior to the Special Use Permit requirement for electronic towers. Council was referred to letter from Thomas Mulcahy (6/4/86)requesting that the tower be re-located to the northwest corner of the applicant's house, reducing the visual impact from his yard. Moerke reported that he has talked with all of his neighbors and has shown them the tower modifications he proposes; reported that none of his neighbors, other than Mulcahy, have expressed a visual problem with the tower or proposed modification. Moerke said that relocation of the tower as suggested would require considerable tree removal. Hicks moved, seconded by Sather, that Council deem the changes proposed a modification of an existing use and grant the changes to the tower as proposed by the applicant. In discussion, Moerke explained that the tower height will not be changed; new antenna will allow him to use three separate frequencies and will not be affected by sun spots; explained that he now receives a lot of noise and no signals; new antenna will have a 5 foot greater diameter; it is not a crank up-and-down model. Motion carried (Hicks, Hansen, Woodburn, Sather voting in favor of the motion; Peck voting in opposition). (4-1) REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR ROBERT RADDATZ Karth Lake PumpinR Council was referred to Raddatz's memo (6/9/86) listing the project costs. Raddatz reported that no problems were experienced during the 11 day pumping project (May 22 - June 2). Raddatz noted that some of the items listed can be used again, e.g. pipe, wood, re-bars, etc. Raddatz reported receipt of a few minor complaints re noise and pipe placement; reported that he talked with Engineer Christoffersen relative to possible use of #10 pumping station pumps in a permanent Karth Lake pumping station; noted