CC 02-11-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Regular Council Meeting Page two February 11) 1985 Hicks asked about amount of space required at the Big Ten for this operation. Hunger estimated it as about 8 feet by 5 feet; he will have a paid employee operatin, it, Bi. Ten i. paid for the .pace. Mun,er alle.e. havin, an opera- tion of this type in an establishment will increase patronage, thus increas- ing business in the community. Hicks asked if they would be trying to operate in other bars in the areal Hunger could not answer at present, probably will wait to see how this one goes, plan to approach only establishments where liquor is served since they do not feel this activity appropriate in places children might frequent. In answer to further query from Hicks, he stated that any non-profit organization can apply for a license under new State law. Peck asked if other applications would pass .through this Council, or be automatically granted by State, and if we are assuming any liability by approving this type of thing? McNiesh said that all applications come to the Council, and liabilities, if any, will be assumed by the State. The Multiple Sclerosis Society.is required to have a fidelity bond, and all employees are bonded. Hunger further stated that the Council, under State law, does not have the power to authorize a site, but does have the power to restrict one. Council asked length of time license would be in effect; it is understood to be one year from date it is granted. Munger added that he feels his organization has the resources and personnel to be sure "it is done right". Sather asked if they would be required to furnish financial information to the State. Munger reviewed the accounting process used; detailed financial statements are required by the State under license obligations. Woodburn asked if~e .uld have specific financial information about the results of the Big AO ion at the end of a year; Munger replied they would have, and wil furnish this plus a complete breakdown on how the money ia spent, to the City. Hicks stated he would feel more comfortable if there were some guidelines established on numbers of these operations that would be allowed, or would be applying for permission, would like to see a limit on it. Sather felt, in terms of how many participated, there would probably be a "wait and aee" attitude at the inception of this new law. Peck asked if this were the only chance the City would have to act on this; if there is some problem, could actions be taken by the City. Munger stated that if there are any problems, City will have the right to pass further re- strictions. It was moved by Hicks, seconded by Sather, that Council adopt Resolution No. 85-11, ALLOWING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY TO OPERATE A STATE GAMBLING (CLASS B) LICENSE ACTIVITY IN THE BIG TEN SUPPER CLUB. Motion carried. (5-0) It is understood that this is a one year license, to be re-evaluated before renewal. Interview - Bond Counsel/Financial Consultant Following Council instructions of January 28th meeting, McNiesh had dis- tributed proposals from all applicants for this/these positions to Council, then polled Council concerning interviews. Accordingly, three applicants have been invited to this meeting. Thomas Deans - Mr. Deans, Knutson, Flynn and Hetland (former Popovich firm) proposes representing Arden Hills as financial consultant and bond counsel; noted his firm is one of very few acting as both', currently represents several local cities plus school districts throughout the state. He pro- posed performing all duties involved in these positions. He feels there are advantages in having a lawyer involved in financial consulting phase should an assessment be challenged; his firm would act in conjunction with separate bond counsel on this, further feels his firm is more in tune than most with what the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court is requiring. His firm has also acted as special counsel in Industrial Revenue Bond financ- ing (intermediary person who makes sure all procedures are followed correctly) and that the City's interests are protected), does not bring IRB applicants to the City, but will act as co-counsel if needed. These fees are always paid by the applicant. I I I '-- ...-