My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-23-1984
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
CC 04-23-1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:36 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:09:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting <br />Monday, April 23, 1984 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />Vehicle Rental for Summer Months <br />Council was referred to Johansen's memo of 4/17/84 and attached <br />quotes from five rental agencies. <br /> <br />Concerns expressed relative to the proposed rental of Johansen's <br />personal vehicle: <br /> <br />1. Not green in color. <br /> <br />2. Insurance coverage, which Johansen said he would <br />check out with the Hite Agency (City's agent). <br /> <br />A. Covered by City or Johansen's policy? <br />B. Deductible Collision coverage? <br /> <br />3. Probably not a good precedent to set. <br /> <br />4. Not a full-sized truck. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />After discussion, Hicks moved, seconded by Christiansen, that <br />Council authorize the rental of Johansen's truck for the three <br />Summer months at $400/month as per memo. <br /> <br />In further discussion, Mulcahy said he does not feel it is a wise <br />general policy, but is willing to try it one year. Rauenhorst <br />- sajd she sees no advantage to the City when a Road King or Courier <br />can be rented at $420/month. Motion carried (Hicks, Christiansen, <br />Mulcahy voting in favor; Rauenhorst, Woodburn voting in opposition). <br />(3-2) <br /> <br />Employees Uniform Service <br />Council was referred to Public Works Committee Minutes, and to <br />Johansen's memo of 4/19/84. <br /> <br />Johansen reported that the Public Works Committee recommends Council <br />approval of the Public Works Employees uniform allowance proposal <br />as outlined in the memo; reported that the proposal is acceptable <br />to the Public Works and Parks Department employees; noted that if <br />the proposal does not prove to be satisfactory, and Council wishes <br />to discontinue the allowance, rental of uniform service can be <br />resumed. <br /> <br />Johansen reported that Roseville follows a similar practice, and <br />has experienced no problems. <br /> <br />Christiansen moved, seconded by Hicks, that Council approve the <br />uniform allowance proposal as outlined. Motion carried <br />(Christiansen, Hicks, Woodburn voting in favor of the motion; <br />Rauenhorst and Mulcahy voting in opposition). (3-2) <br /> <br />Summer Public Works Employees <br />Council was referred to Johansen's memo (4-17-84) re Summer <br />Employees. <br /> <br />Hicks moved, seconded by Christiansen, that Council approve the . <br />employment of Steve Zehm, Bruce Landman and Steve Oen as out- <br />lined in the memo. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />Discussion - Financing Additional Water Tower <br />Woodburn reported that the arsenal wants to know soon whether <br />Arden Hills will provide water to the arsenal and, if so, what <br />the charges would be. Woodburn referred Council to several tables <br />he had prepared re how the sale of water to the arsenal will affect <br />the City. <br /> <br />Mulcahy queried the City's need for another water tower; suggested <br />that the City's need for a water tower is different from the need <br />for a water tower to serve water to the arsenal. <br /> <br />Rauenhorst noted that "water for the arsenal" is not on the agenda; <br />therefore Council should not discuss water to the arsenal tonight. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.