My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-26-1996
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCP 02-26-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:44 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:11:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I - <br />, <br />I. MINUTES <br />I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA <br /> REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />I FEBRUARY 12, 1996 <br /> 7:30 P.M. - NEW BRIGHTON COUNCIL CHAMBERS <br />I <br />I CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Dennis Probst called to order the regular <br />I City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m. <br /> Present: Mayor Dennis Probst; Councilmembers Beverly Aplikowski, Dale Hicks, <br />I Susan Keirn. <br />I Absent: Councilmember Paul Malone <br /> Also present were: City Administrator, Brian Fritsinger; City Accountant, Terry Post; <br />... Public Works Superintendent, Dwayne Stafford; Community Development Director, <br /> Kevin Ringwald; City Engineer, Greg Stonehouse: and Recording Secretary, Cathy <br /> Sorensen. <br />I ADOPT AGENDA <br />I MOTION: Keirn moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt the agenda for the <br /> February 12, 1996 Regular City Council meeting as presented, with the exception <br /> of Item C of Unfinished and New Business to be moved to Item A. The motion <br />I carried unanimously (4-0). <br />I APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> December 26, 1995: <br />I Page 8, Paragraph 1, change "Mayor Probst stated that the oversize should not be <br /> viewed as an addition, and therefore not the City's responsibility." to: <br />I "Mayor Probst stated that the oversize should be viewed as an addition, and <br /> therefore not the City's responsibility, unless it is demonstrated that the over-sizing <br />I is not required for fire suppression purposes." <br />.- January 29, 1996: <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.