Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> -----.-.-- ---.---- <br /> . <br /> "I <br /> I would suggest to the Council that it not accept condition number four; final .' <br /> approval. This is a dangerous precedent to set in both potential cost to the city and <br /> the relationship to the authority of the Council's decision making process. The <br /> residents need to understand that the City will make every effort to save . <br /> improvements in the ROW, but the ROW is intended for utility/street purposes <br /> not private improvements. <br /> The Council should also be aware of the actual street width being proposed. The . <br /> interpretation of street width by residents may not be consistent with that being . <br /> proposed by the City Engineer. Typically the street width is defined as curb face <br /> to curb face, with the curb extending further into the ROW. In this case the <br /> residents have requested 26 feet. The engineer is actually proposing a 24 foot I <br /> wide street curb face to curb face, but because of the dimensions of a <br /> surmountable curb, the width from back of curb to back of curb will exceed 26 <br /> feet. . <br /> The City Engineer will not be available at the meeting so please forward any <br /> questions you may have to staff prior to the meeting_ . <br /> 2. Non-Agenda Items <br /> a. Thank You Letter to Roger Williams I <br /> I will be sending this letter to Mr. Williams thanking him for his assistance at the <br /> recent retreat. Let me know if you have any suggested changes_ <br /> b. Packet of 1996 ProDertv Tax Information .. <br /> c. March 1. J 996. LMC Cities Bulletin . <br /> d. County Road F Renamine: Survev . <br /> Februarv 29. 1996. AMM Bill Tracking Sheet <br /> e. <br /> f. Shoreland Management and Floodplain Ordinance Review . <br /> In light of the recent scrutiny of the Arden Hills ordinances affecting Shoreland <br /> Management and Floodplains, the City contacted the MN DNR. It was our . <br /> intention to begin working on updating these two ordinances. <br /> The DNR responded by stating that Arden Hills was not a priority for them and . <br /> they did not wish to address these issues at this time. Apparently the DNR ranks <br /> cities on a 1-4 basis, with I begin most critical for their attention_ Arden Hills is <br /> ranked 3 and because of the DNR's focus on rankings I and 2, they advised us to I <br /> wait. <br /> g. March 6. 1996. Planning Commission Meeting Actions . <br /> The Commission reviewed three cases at the March 6, 1996 meeting. The .. <br /> following actions were taken: <br /> I <br />