CCP 03-11-1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

" ,.. . Mr. Warkentin objected to the plan, specifically the design of the cul-de-sac as it would be paved . a few feet closer to his property line, although still very much within the right-of-way. -. The residents also were not sure what exactly they wanted, although they agreed that the street needed work. Mr. Stonehouse and Mr. Fritsinger pointed out that there are three (3) options. 1. Leave street as is with routine maintenance. I 2. Reconstruct the street to a 26 foot width, concrete curb and gutter, and tweaking the cul-de-sac design to satisfy the residents as best possible. 0 Cold-in-place recycling then overlaying, with the understanding this option is not ~. I supported by the Engineers and Council and would be assessed 100 percent to property owners along Oak Avenue. The residents seemed pleased with the City staff and the Engineers efforts to resolve their . differences, but requested a few days to talk things over among themselves. Oak Avenue Residents Recommendations I On March 5, 1996, a copy of the recommendations was received from the residents of Oak A venue. Enclosed is a copy of those recommendations. . Staff Recommendations After consulting with Mr. Stonehouse in regards to the Oak A venue residents recommendations, I the Public Works staff recommends reconstruction of Oak Avenue with a 26 foot street width and surmountable concrete curb and gutter. .. The cul-de-sac would be designed as shown in the attached Exhibit I, with the understanding that large trucks or busses may not be able to make the turn around without jumping the curb with the I front or rear axles. The Public Works staff is opposed to the residents request for the final approval of the plans. . DS\jt I I . . I .. I