My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-17-1996
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCP 06-17-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:50 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:12:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I . <br /> 'S(~ <br />~- ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - DE~EMBER II , 1995 6 <br />I . . <br /> Council member Aplikowski asked how a nonsingle-family units is defined. Mr. Frost indicated <br /> anything that is not it typical single-family detached unit. <br />I Mayor Probst inquired as to iflhe percentages for each of these goals we've determined by the <br />I existing Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Ringwald indicated that was correct. The percentages for <br /> each goal was determined by evaluating smal! developing communities in the Metropolitan area, <br /> not by evaluating some of the residential concepts discussed in the task force meetings. <br />I Council member Hicks indicated, based on current housing sales in Arden Hills, new housing <br /> would most likely not qualify as affordable housing. Mr. Frost indicated that would be correct, <br />I unless perhaps it would be of a town home or multifamily construction with smaller lot sizes. <br /> Mayor Probst indicated the affordable housing is also determined by ownership, not necessarily <br />I only single-family dwellings. Mr. Frost indicated that was correct. <br /> Council member Hicks felt 65% was a high number to achieve in affordable housing, but given <br />I the Council can review participation after one year, he would support the resolution. <br /> MOTION: Keim moved and Hicks seconded a motion to adopt Resolution Number 95-86, <br />.. Livable Communities Act Goals. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br />I evelopment Director Ringwald indicated the increase in the contract is mostly due <br />I aw requiring detaining animals for ten days. <br /> Mr. Ringwald indicat affs goal to continue to review the expenditures in this area and to <br />I keep the amount under co <br /> Mayor Probst inquired if the incre in the budget at certain times is due to more aggressive - <br />I animal control. Mr. Ringwald indicat at was correct. When animals are brought in, the City <br /> is required to hold them for ten days and b ing becomes expensive. <br />I Mr. Post noted this is another example of an unfuri <br /> Mr. Ringwald indicated the current system is to respond to <br />I control and less on setting live traps, etc. <br /> Council member Aplikowski asked if the property owners could pay a on of the cost to <br />I contain the animals, such as in the mobile home park. Mr. Fritsinger indica . s could be <br /> reviewed as part of the codification process. <br />,. <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.