CCP 06-24-1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I' . DRAFT ~- ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 5 1996 5 I in the area. Mr. Ringwald suggested the Planning Commission request the applicant to provide the I plans for the City Council's consideration. Carlson moved, seconded by Sand, to approve Planning Case #96-06, subject to the I following conditions: The motion carried unanimously (7-0). 1. If the building is damaged or destroyed by any cause in excess of fifty percent (50%) I of the fair market value of said building, as determined by the building inspector, then the side yard (north property line) setback variance as explicitly shown on Exhibit A, page 1 of3 of this memorandum would become null and void; and I 2. City Council consideration of the proposed site plan, including the exterior elevations I of the proposed addition. PUBLIC HEARING CASE #96-07 HOLIDAY INN 1201 WEST COUNTY ROAD E SITE PLAN REVIEW I Chair Erickson opened the public hearing at 8:09 p.m. .. Mr. Ringwald verified notice of public hearing in the Focus on May 23rd and 30th, 1996. I Mr. Ringwald reported that the applicant is requesting a modification to their site plan for placement of an air conditioning system on the ground adjacent to the rear of the building. He stated the manufacturer of the system no longer manufactures replacement parts for this type of system, and I the new system cannot be placed on the roof without modifying the structural integrity of the roof system. He stated the new air conditioning system is eight feet in width, 25 feet in length, and eight feet in height. I Mr. Ringwald stated the proposed location would require relocating of an existing vehicular drive I aisle. He stated there currently exists a concrete sidewalk that extends through the area that is being proposed to be fenced off for screening purposes. He stated the sidewalk only provides access to a mechanical room and does not serve any public access point. I Mr. Ringwald stated placement of the system would result in the loss of three parking stalls, but should not impact parking availability on the site given the number of vacant parking stalls that I typically exist on the site. Mr. Ringwald stated the applicant is proposing to enclose the system with an eight-foot chain link I fence with "Holiday Inn" green inserts. He stated the system is not readily visible from the public right-of-way, but is visible to adjacent property owners. He suggested the Planning Commission " may wish to discuss alterative screening materials, such as a board on board fence. I ,