Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I -S-( s- <br />I tJ,,"', <br /> o;;,...~l,i/<" <br />" Commission Larson asked what constituted the PUD documents, if the applid~tO(fp<)rt was <br /> included in the PUD Documents and a delineation of the Key Landscape Elemenfl!w'arcluded. <br /> Mr. Ringwald explained the PUD document is a very specific document which incorporates all <br />I of the conditions, maps, and charts. The elements of the applicant's which were approved would <br /> be included in the document and a blow up of each Key Landscape Element which illustrates <br /> specifically what is being required and approved is included. <br />I Commissioner Larson noted Staff had previously recommended that payment of the appropriate <br /> park dedication fee be required rather than dedication of land. <br />I Mr. Ringwald explained this had been revised due to the recommendation of the Park and <br />I Recreation Committee and the Director of Parks and Recreation. The City currently has a 70 <br /> foot easement on the property west of the parking lot and east of the existing trail. Control Data <br /> is requesting and the Park and Recreation Committee is concurring that Control Data dedicated <br />I to the City that property and also and additional 30 foot strip adjacent to it. The City would then <br /> own the westerly 100 feet of the approximately 200 foot wide wooded area. Control Data would <br /> own the easterly 100 feet and would be responsible for maintaining their portion of the required <br />I buffer. <br /> Commissioner Larson stated he understood the need for flexibility on the site but felt that a <br />.. larger continuous area set aside to be preserved was more valuable than having landscaping <br /> divided up around the site. He noted this item could be visited again in the future if there was <br /> rationale to do so. <br />I Larson moved, seconded by Sand, to approve Planning Case #96-05, PUD Master Plan, <br /> subject to the 12 conditions outlined above and amending Condition 5 by inserting <br />I inserting "prior to any further site plan approvals are granted on Parcels A-I and C" after <br /> "...Femwood Avenue shall be eliminated and replaced with landscaping". The motion <br />I carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> Sand moved, seconded by Carlson to approve Planning Case #96-05, preliminary minor <br />I subdivision, subject to the three conditions outlined above. The motion carried <br /> unanimously (4-0). <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />-- <br />I <br />