My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-30-1996
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCP 09-30-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:58 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:12:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Aug-22~9~ ~2~~~P C"!.~~_,~! ~rger:' H;lls 612 633-7839 P.04 I <br /> ~ . - .~.~ ~ - .- ....... .-," ,~.,-,._, <br /> , <br /><[ III I <br /> , <br />Kevin Ringwald <br />August 19, 1996 <br />Page 2 <br /> fed on the front of the garage, for a total length of <br /> approximately 205 fed in the expanded portion of the g11rege <br /> 2 The forward expansion would not e"cud the length of a I <br /> current overhang roof, which minimizes the visual impact 0 f the <br /> expansion 1 <br /> 3. The expansion project would include the removal of a wall and <br /> structure design.iled as a "shed" on our survey, which itself I <br /> e;;tends several feet closer to the right-of-way than the <br /> proposed addition Hence, the net visual cff~ will be to <br /> increase rather than to d=ease the actual sctback I <br /> 4 The fact that the proposed construction will occur beneath the <br /> gnde of the adjacent property further rcduces any visual impact I <br /> caused by tbe expansion <br /> Regardmg the possibility of expanding the garage to the west as well ~ .. <br />to the ust, this is not practical {or the following reasons <br /> J, The west wall of the garage is a concrete block, load-bearing <br /> wall. Its removal would require additional I-beam support for I <br /> the house, wrjch would mak. the enlire project financially <br /> impractiC<ll. <br /> 2 The area in oW' home to the west of the existing garage walt is I <br /> currently used as our fi"onl entry, a wall::d laundry room and a <br /> walled bathroom. NOlle of those aru.s could tolerate I <br /> dimWsh<<l size. Moreovet, any significan1 alteration of the <br /> existing use of those areas would again cause the entire proj~t <br /> to be fuuncially impractical I <br /> Please let me know if the City or the Planning CommissioQer ha~e lUly <br />additional questions I do intend to be at tbe Planning Commission meC'ting or. 1 <br />Wednesday, September 4, 1996 in ease .omethicg come. up at that time. Our <br />neighbors have all expressed support for this project and have indicated their <br />willingness to ""prns suppOrt at the meeting if necessary I would apprechte I <br />receiving YO\lr ad'<ic.e on this <br /> I <br /> .. <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.