Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 114, I <br /> IN ADDITION, THE GRANTING OF SUCH CHANGES WOULD: I <br /> .. <br /> . Create a loss of property value <br /> . Have a negative impact on buildability I <br /> . Be contrary to the Comprehensive Plan and Code which call for a 75' setback I <br /> (the parking lot was constructed with a 9' setback) <br /> . Set a precedent for other organizations to come in expecting the same variances I <br /> . Reduce or negate the value of portions of the Comprehensive Plan, Code, and Zoning <br /> Ordinances I <br /> . Call into question the role of a quasi-governmental organization, LJVFD, as an I <br /> organization which did not know/comply with City-mandated procedures and <br /> processes under which it operates. LJVFD receives tax dollars to provide services. As I <br /> a quasi-governmental agency, should the City expect them to set an example? <br /> . Reduce the value of an unsolicited offer and expressions of interest 1 have received .. <br /> for the land from Arden Hills residents, developers, and Realtors <br /> . Diminish property values of abutting and nearby property owners I <br /> . Reduce my ability to improve my abutting property I <br /> . Send a signal that it is OK to ignore City Ordinances, thereby creating a precedent <br /> regarding the strength and ability of the Planning Commission to uphold the City's I <br /> City's codes, ordinances, and Comprehensive Plan <br /> . Suggest that large sums of city monies can be spent without explicit city knowledge, I <br /> without accountability, without requiring alternatives to be adequately addressed, <br /> without exploring other options, and perhaps without seeking competitive bids I <br /> . Infer LJVFD was presented with a blank check to spend I <br /> . Call into question provisions of Minnesota State Statute 462.357 on Planning and <br /> Zoning variance I <br /> .. <br /> Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting, September 4, 1996, page 7 I <br />