CCP 11-25-1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. .. Lastly, the Staffreceived a letter dated October 21, 1996 from Neil Meyer of Meyer & Njus, attorneys, representing the owners of Shannon Square (Exhibit D). The letter summarizes their . position on the applicants submittal. . Deadline for A~encv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the complete application for this request on August 21, 1996. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute the City must act on this request by Friday, October 18, 1996 . (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The additional review period would extend to Thursday, December 19, 1996. The City may with the petitioners consent extend the review period beyond the Thursday, . December 19, 1996 date. The City had this request scheduled for the Tuesday, October 15,1996 City Council meeting. . The applicant, at the Planning Commission meeting, requested that the City Council hear this case at its Monday, October 28, 1996 regular meeting. The City had provided the applicant with written notice that the time period for the review of their application is being extended an . additional 60 days to Thursday, December 19, 1996. . Lastly, if the City denies the petitioners request, then "... it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request." Ie Notes 1. The Zoning Ordinance in Section VIII, D, 6, c, requires a "... vote of at least four-fifths (4/5) of the full council..." to approve a PUD Master Plan. . 2. If the City Council should deny the applicants request either "...wholly or in part...", then pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance in Section VIII, E, 4, the application cannot "...be resubmitted for a period of six (6) months from the date of said order of denial." . . . . . I ,. .