Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I 9/9 <br /> I <br /> ii. Is part of an architecturally unified "food court" or "drive-in service court" <br /> ,. complex containing two or more restaurants, fast food restaurants or drive-in <br /> businesses." <br /> ! <br /> i 3. Principal differences in these provisions are: <br /> I <br /> a. B-4 District - Drive-in businesses or fast foot restaurants must be an integral part of <br /> , a building containing one or more allowed useS and one or more of such drive-in or <br /> I fast food operations is allowed. <br /> , <br /> I b B-3 District - Such drive in businesses or fast food restaurants are allowed if1YLQ...Qr <br /> ~ ~ such uses are within a freestanding building or unified complex grif one or more <br /> of such uses are part of a building containing other allowed uses. <br /> I .' <br /> 4. I recall that in the ordinance drafting stage, the issue of space configuration was discussed - <br /> should we require separate kitchen, drive-up windows or food pick-up lines? Common <br /> i parking and dining areas were assumed to be basic requirements. We finally determined that <br /> - instead of trying to design the internal operation by ordinance we would leave that to the <br /> applicant. <br /> , 5. Subparagraphs V.H.4.b,d. and e, further defme the possibilities and parameters for site and <br /> building configurations. <br /> .... <br /> Ie Sincerely, <br /> acker Wehrman Bergly, Inc. <br /> , <br /> I <br /> I /JOhnBer~~ <br /> , <br /> , <br /> ..: <br /> I Vice-President <br /> i :dmn <br /> I Copy: Mr. Lloyd Keppel <br /> ~ <br /> ! <br /> * <br /> P <br /> ...J <br /> I <br /> i <br />