CCP 12-09-1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,---,-- ~- .~ -~f:r--~I- ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 25. 1996 2 I November 12, 1996, Regular Council Meeting .. Correct Page 6, fourth paragraph, to indicate: "Councilmember Malone asked staff to determinc the amount of interest that has accrued on strcet improvement I assessments in the PIR fund, to assist Council in making a determination on the scone of 1997 Street Improvement projects." Correct Page 7, third paragraph, to indicate: "Mr. Fritsinger noted the League policies are similar to those of AMM but I the League represents cities as a whole state-wide. MOTION: Malone moved and Keim seconded a motion to approve the November 12, 1996, I Regular Council Meeting minutes as corrected. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). PUBLIC COMMENTS I Mayor Probst invited the audience to address the Council on any issue not already on the agenda. . There were no public comments. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS I A. Planning Case #96-17, Arby's/Sbarro PUD .. Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director, reviewed the location of the property under consideration and surrounding uses. He explained the applicant is requesting approval of a I Planned Unit Development (PUD) Master Plan (St. Paul Properties) and Final Plan (Arby's/Sbarro) to facilitate the construction ofa 4,137 square foot fast food restaurant on an approximately five acre parcel zoned B,3. The applicant is proposing two principal uses for the . property, a fast food use and a retail use. Mr. Ringwald advised the Planning Commission separated this application into two areas of I discussion, use of the property and traffic related issues. He commented on the proposed use of the property, Lexington Avenue Business Plan, and memorandum from various traffIc consultants. Mr. Ringwald noted that fast food restaurants in Arden Hills must be at least 1,320 I feet apart, however, Section V, H, 4 ofthe Zoning Ordinance allows a waiver within a B-3 zone if the use can meet five criteria which have been set forth. He reviewed the five criteria as I follows and explained each: L The operation consists of one or more drive-in businesses or fast food restaurants and is I an integral part of a building containing one or more other allowed uses, or the operation is part of an architecturally unifIed "food court" or "drive-in service court" complex containing two or more restaurants, fast food restaurants or drive-in businesses; I 2. Shared access drives and shared parking are utilized by all such restaurants, fast food restaurants or drive-in businesses in said building or complex; .. I