My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
11-24-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2025 1:52:02 PM
Creation date
11/21/2025 1:40:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
313
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION — November 5, 2025 6 <br />Director, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City <br />Council. <br />2) A separate sign permit shall be required for all proposed signage. <br />3) All signage shall meet all other requirements of Sign District 5. <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br />Chair Collins opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br />Commissioner Burlingame asked if staff believed there were any physical or topographical <br />conditions that make the existing signs not visible from the adjoining streets. <br />Senior Planner Fransen stated the topography of the land was fairly flat but noted this was a <br />large building and the current layout of the building on the site makes it difficult to see the <br />signage from the other elevations. <br />Commissioner Julius inquired if the sign illumination would adversely impact the neighboring <br />properties or adjacent residents. <br />Senior Planner Fransen commented she did not believe the proposed sign would impact the <br />adjacent businesses or property owners, as the current signage was not causing any concerns. <br />Commissioner Lindau reported both Walgreens and The Tavern exceed the City's sign code <br />standards. <br />Senior Planner Fransen confirmed this was the case. <br />Commissioner Bjorklund stated this business had frontage on Lexington Avenue and no <br />signage along Lexington Avenue. He believed this was a hardship for the business and should be <br />considered a Finding of Fact. <br />Commissioner Jacobson agreed with Commissioner Bjorklund's statement. She asked if the <br />new sign would be twice as big as the existing sign. <br />Senior Planner Fransen stated this would be the case. <br />Commissioner Jacobson noted this property does not have any monument signs and indicated <br />she could support the addition of one more sign on the wall face for this building. <br />Commissioner Bjorklund commented on how the proposed wall sign was proportional for the <br />building elevation. <br />Chair Collins requested the applicant come forward at this time. <br />Commissioner Jacobson asked if the second sign would be double the size of the existing wall <br />sign. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.