My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
11-24-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2025 1:52:02 PM
Creation date
11/21/2025 1:40:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
313
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION — November 5, 2025 7 <br />Austin Harris, representative for Goodwill, explained the new wall sign would be 58.8 square <br />feet in size and the existing signs were 40 square feet in size. He discussed how the proposed <br />sign size would complement the wall fagade. <br />Chair Collins commented on how the building side facing the street was like a black hole and he <br />supported the requested sign. He was of the opinion the requested sign size was reasonable and <br />noted he supported the sign standard adjustment. <br />Commissioner Jacobson reported she visited this area and noted many of the other businesses <br />in this area have multiple signs, including wall signs and monument signs. She believed this <br />request was in keeping with the surrounding businesses. <br />Commissioner Burlingame moved and Commissioner Lindau seconded a motion to <br />recommend approval of Planning Case 25-012 for a Sign Standard Adiustment through the <br />Site Plan Review process to install an additional wall sign of up to 60 square feet on the <br />east building elevation at 1103 County Road E West, based on the findings of fact and the <br />submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the November 5, 2025, Report to the <br />Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). <br />UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br />None. <br />REPORTS <br />A. Report from the City Council <br />Councilmember Weber provided the Commission with an update from the City Council. He <br />noted last month the Council approved the rear yard setback for the property on Lake Josephine. <br />He indicated the Council received an update from HKGi on the Zoning Code and began an initial <br />review of the City's housing affordability language. He thanked Community Development <br />Director Reilly for the highly detailed staff report that was provided to the City Council on this <br />topic. He then provided the Commission with information on where the JDA was at with the RFI <br />(Request for Information) process. He noted if changes were needed to the TRC (TCAAP <br />Redevelopment Code) these requests would be reviewed by the Planning Commission and a <br />recommendation would be passed along with the City Council. <br />Commissioner Bjorklund asked what would be constructed first within Rice Creek Commons. <br />Councilmember Weber stated this would be hard to determine and noted the JDA and City <br />Council would learn more about this through the RFI process. <br />Commissioner Jacobson inquired if it was advantageous to construct Rice Creek Boulevard <br />before a developer was selected for this project. <br />Councilmember Weber reported Ramsey County owns the property and this was a decision <br />made by Ramsey County. <br />B. Planning Commission Comments and Requests <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.