My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 10-02-1989
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
CC 10-02-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:08 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:22:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> October 2, 1989 Special Council Meeting, Page Two <br />. <br /> City Engineer looking at the plans and being allowed to inspect the work. <br /> City Attorney Filla noted that local zoning regulations do not apply to <br /> the Army or TCAAP. He said if TCAAP is agreeable to review by Arden <br /> Hills, that would be fine, but he was not sure if the Army would agree to <br /> such a review. <br /> Councilmember Malone suggested the City be allowed to. review the site <br /> plan, make inspections and recommendations and that Arden Hills will <br /> expect a response from TCAAP. Filla suggested the Council tell the Army <br /> what they want, otherwise the Army will not receive water from Shoreview <br /> unless Arden Hills' concerns are included in the agreement. <br /> Councilmember Mahowald questioned if Arden Hills can be bought for $52,000 <br /> for something they don't want or care about. He suggested the City take a <br /> tougher stance and attempt to have more say in the plans. Councilmember <br /> Growe suggested seeing how expensive it might be for the Army to proceed <br /> on their own. Chuck Ahl noted that Shoreview's original price for the <br /> utility service was $325,000 and that if neither Shoreview or Arden Hills <br /> w~nts to participate, the Army has their own set of plans to proceed on <br /> their own. <br />. Councilmernber Malone asked to make the agreement a lfthree partyU agreement <br /> between Arden Hills, Shoreview and the Army, to allow inspection, review <br /> and comments by Arden Hills on the proposed plan, with the Army to respond <br /> to Arden Hi lIs' comments~ particularly reducing the visual impact as much <br /> as possible. <br /> City Attorney Filla noted that money is not an issue to the Army, timing <br /> is important and the Army might allow Arden Hills to have input on the <br /> site review. Filla suggested that until Arden Hills' concerns are <br /> ddressed, Shoreview will not provide utilities, and that perhaps this plan <br /> should be reviewed by the Planning Commission. He asked how long it may <br /> take to get a response from the Army. Chuck Ahl stated a response could <br /> take from 2 weeks to 30 days if the Army is receptive, or they might not <br /> be receptive to a review at all. It is conceivable that the Army could <br /> close the door and walk away, with no negotiations with anyone. <br /> Public Works Supervisor Winkel asked who will provide police/fire <br /> protection to this building. If Arden Hills does, the Army should be <br /> charged. <br /> Chuck Ahl, Shoreview Public Works Director, noted he spoke to Mike Fix of <br /> the Army and was told the permit is to allow Honeywell to store hazardous <br /> materials on the site longer than 90 days and for disposal. Site F will <br /> be closed and could be used as a detonation site. The permit will require <br /> clean-up and closing of Site F per EPA and PCA regulations. <br />. Attorney Filla said the hearing notice permit imposes standards that were <br /> not in effect in 1979, will make the site safer, and will not allow new <br /> materials to be brought to the site. Filla asked how much time the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.