My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 10-02-1989
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
CC 10-02-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:08 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:22:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> October 2, 1989 Special Council Meeting, Page Three <br />. <br /> has before they have to take action. Chuck Ahl noted that Ramsey County <br /> has about 3-4 months before Lexington Avenue will go, and the Army has the <br /> money now and needs to get started as soon as possible. Funds were given <br /> to the Army for this specific project. <br /> Counci1member Hansen asked why Arden Hills' share of the Lexington Avenue <br /> cost is less than Shoreview's. Ah1 noted that Shoreview has additional <br /> storm sewer improvement costs. <br /> Counci1member Malone said he would rather be responsible for the City's <br /> funds to upgrade the west side of Lexington and the City should control <br /> their own resources and funding, rather than having Shoreview paying the <br /> costs with Arden Hills money. <br /> Attorney Filla noted the agreement should reflect that Shoreview will pay <br /> Arden Hills their share of the payment and this should be in a separate <br /> agreement between the two cities. <br /> Councilmember Hansen noted she would like Arden Hills' name included in <br /> the agreement for building inspection and site review. <br /> Attorney Filla suggested the agreement be approved subject to the <br /> following: that the agreement will have to be amended to allow Arden <br />. Hills review and comments on: <br /> 1. site development plans. <br /> 2. utility plans. <br /> 3. a separate agreement between the two cities indicating the manner in <br /> which the initial fee will be divided. <br /> Councilmember Mahowald suggested including assurance of compliance with <br /> building and fire codes, setback requirements, landscape plans, and <br /> aesthetics including a buffer or green space between the parking lot and <br /> right-of-way on Lexington. Filla suggested that the utilities be <br /> disconnected if these items are not completed within a reasonable period <br /> of time. <br /> Councilmember Growe moved, seconded by Councilmember Malone, to approve <br /> the agreement subject to: <br /> 1. Review of utility plans by the Arden Hills City Engineer and/or Public <br /> Works Supervisor. <br /> 2. Review of site and landscape plans, including compliance with State <br /> fire and building codes, as well as setback requirements. <br /> 3. A provision to include discontinuation of utility service if the site <br /> plans as reviewed by Arden Hills are not constructed within a <br /> reasonable time period. <br /> 4. An agreement between Arden Hills and Shoreview as to how the initial <br /> fee of $200,000 will be split (50-50) and the imposition of a 10% <br />. surcharge on quarterly utility rates to be paid by Shoreview to the <br /> City of Arden Hills. <br /> Motion carried unanimously, (4-0) . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.