Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br />proposal would reduce a street access nonconformity but it does not conform with subdivision <br />requirements for lot location on a public street and also does not conform with Zoning Code <br />requirements for number and size of accessory structures. The proposed would address four <br />nonconforming accessory structures for location while creating a new nonconforming accessory <br />structure for location and increasing the nonconformities of number and size of accessory <br />structures for Subject Property B. The applicable requirements and evaluations of the proposed <br />subdivision are addressed in the next section. <br /> <br />Plan Evaluation <br /> <br />Chapter 11, Subdivisions Regulations Review <br /> <br />1. 1150.04 Division or Consolidation of Platted Lots of Record <br /> <br />The application is to divide one or more existing platted lots designated in a subdivision plat on <br />file and of record in the office of the recorder or registrar of titles for the county, into one or more <br />separately described parcels. While the minor subdivision request does not create new lots, the <br />request further divides the subject properties. The Application is subject to compliance with the <br />conditions for Survey, Relation to Zoning Ordinance, Public Welfare, Conformity, and Filing Fee. <br /> <br />The application meets the requirements for these conditions except Conformity, which requires <br />that the proposed division shall conform to such other requirements in the Subdivision chapter of <br />the City Code. The proposed adjustments to the lot lines impacting Subject Properties B and C do <br />not bring Subject Property B into full conformance with the Subdivision code as it relates to lot <br />location on a public street. The proposed also does not bring all subject properties into <br />conformance with the Zoning Code, which is evaluated in the next section. <br /> <br />Location - Nonconforming <br />All lots are required to abut by their full frontage on a public street. Subject Property C has frontage <br />on Oak Avenue and Lake Johanna Boulevard and would be considered a corner lot with the front <br />lot line being along Oak Avenue. The existing Subject Property A does not have any frontage on <br />a public street and is accessible by a driveway easement from Lake Johanna Blvd. The Applicant’s <br />request would not change this, nor would it create another lot that would not have full frontage on <br />a public street. <br /> <br />Subject Property B has frontage on Lake Johanna Blvd but the property does not have direct access <br />to this roadway and the front building line of the principal structure is oriented toward Oak Avenue. <br />Lake Johanna Blvd is a county road and is identified as a community street in the Subdivision code <br />and as a collector street in the Zoning Code. Section 1325.06 of the Zoning Code requires single- <br />family dwellings to provide two (2) off-street parking spaces and all off-street parking spaces shall <br />have access driveways and access directly to public streets. Any residential lot, with frontage on <br />both a local street and a collector street must access the property only from the local street. Based <br />on the code requirements, Subject Property B is required to be accessed from a local street, in this <br />case, Oak Avenue. <br /> <br />Double Frontage Lots – Permitted Exception <br />By incorporating the existing driveway into Subject Property B, the property would become a <br />double frontage lot as defined by the Subdivision Code or through lot as defined by the Zoning <br />Code. The Subdivision code states that double frontage lots shall be avoided except where lots <br />back on an arterial or community street. Lake Johanna Boulevard acts as a community street and