Laserfiche WebLink
CONSENT ITEM <br />AM <br />'!Tt <br />-ARVE HILLS <br />lu I D1►I M tIA-1011110/ <br />DATE: December 8, 2025 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers <br />Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator <br />FROM: Lucas J. Miller, Assistant Public Works Director <br />SUBJECT: 2025 Park Improvement Project— Change Order #1 <br />2025 Park Improvement Project— Payment #1 <br />Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: <br />$230,000 — Arden Oaks Park $558,716.40 <br />$230,000 — Freeway Park (includes $6,175.00 for CO#I) <br />$15,000 — Hoops/Shaded Bench <br />$475,000 Total <br />Council Should Consider <br />Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: <br />Funding Source: <br />PIR — Parks <br />SLP — Lions Club Donation <br />Change Order #1, added amount for adding a draintile system within Freeway Park in <br />low points to promote proper drainage in the amount of $6,175.00. <br />Payment #1 for the 2025 Park Improvement Project Contract to Albrecht Company in the <br />amount of $82,154.10. <br />Background <br />On February 10, 2025, City Council approved Resolution 2025-013 approving the plans and <br />specifications and ordering solicitation of quotes from contractors for the 2025 Park <br />Improvement Project. Five quotes were received on March 5, 2025. On April 14, 2025, Council <br />adopted Resolution 2025-035 Accepting Bid and Awarding the 2025 Park Improvement Project <br />construction contract to Albrecht Companies in the amount of $86,353.00, without the Bid <br />Alternate. The project in total was approved by Council at $554,818.78, a total of $79,818.78 <br />over budget, which included all site work and play structure scope minus some site amenities. <br />Upon completion of final grading around the new pedestrian walkways at Freeway Park getting <br />them up to ADA Standards, there were a couple locations that water could not naturally drain. In <br />order to address this issue, Staff requested some ideas from the Contractor to address the issue. A <br />small drain tile system was one of the options, was most feasible and cost effective. Staff had the <br />Engineer review it and approved having the Contractor move forward with the work. For more <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />