My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 05-14-1990
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
CC 05-14-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:09 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:22:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, May 14, 1990 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />CASE #90-05 (Cont'd) Malone commented that Council does not appreciate the a <br />proposed change in the application after it has been <br />reviewed by the Planning Commission, however, he noted the sign area as proposed <br />will be a reduction fram the existing sign. <br /> <br />Malone JOOVed, secorxied by Hansen, to approve the Special <br />Use Permit, Case #90-05, for the placement of a rooftop sign on the present <br />McQrire's Inn, 1201 West County Road E, such sign to read "Howard Johnson", with <br />the letters comprising the sign not to exceed 5 feet in height and 69 feet in <br />length. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />May= Sather questioned if the pylon sign will be removed and how the restaurant, <br />and lounge will be identified. <br /> <br />Planner Bergly stated the walllllOUl1ted signs on the canopy will be removed, <br />however, the pylon sign will remain. <br /> <br />Council1nember Growe questioned how long the temporary banner will remain on the <br />building . <br /> <br />Steve Kappler advised the banner sign will be removed in June when the <br />wall-mounted sign is installed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planner Bergly discussed the variance request for the two directional signs which <br />are proposed for placement at the front entrances to the site on County Road E. <br /> <br />Bergly reviewed the considerations for the directional sign dimensional variance, <br />as listed in his report of 5-14-90, page 2. He noted variances will be necessary <br />for the following: 1. Sign height (8 inches), 2. Sign width (3 feet, 6 inches), <br />and 3. Sign area (8.2 square feet) . <br /> <br />The Planner referred Council to the Planning Commission minutes of 5-2-90, <br />recornrnending approval of two of the requested variances for width and area, and <br />the Board of Appeals minutes of 4-24-90, recommending denial of the requested <br />variances. He also explained the Planning Conunission found the only hardship to <br />be snow removal on County Road E presents a small problem due to no shoulders for <br />snow placement. <br /> <br />Council1nember Malone questioned the parking setback near the westerly entrance on <br />County Road E; asked the applicant to confonn to the required 20 ft. parking <br />setback . <br /> <br />Kappler advised the reason for parking closer to the street is for the motel to <br />appear occupied. He stated the sign variances are inportant to direct patrons <br />into the motel and therefore he will comply with the required setback if Council <br />attaches such a corxiitions to an approval of the variances. <br /> <br />Council1nember Hansen commented that although she is opposed to sign variances, <br />the signage will provide more visibility for the b.1siness for vehicles traveling <br />east on County Road E fram Snelling Avenue. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.