CC 05-14-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . 1. 2. 3. . 4. 5. Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, May 14, 1990 Page 4 CASE #90-05 (Cont'd) Malone JOOVed, seconded by GrCMe, to awrove the following sign variance request for directional signs at McGuire's Inn (Howard Johnson), Case #90-05, 1201 W. County Road E, based on the applicant's removal of the canopy entrance signs, the directional signs being utilized to assist drivers on a public street with ingress to the site, the limited area f= snow placement on the roadway shoulder during the winter IIlOnths, and the necessity to increase the infonnation on the sign f= vehiCle/driver recognition and conditioned upon the applicant restructuring parking area near the westerly driveway entrance to maintain the 20 ft. parking setback requirement: 1. A Sign width variance of 3 feet 6 inches. 2. A Sign area variance of 8.2 square feet. and, to deny the sign height variance, based on the fact the sign height can be easily adjusted and the 8 inch variance requested will not affect sign visibility . Motion carried unanilnously. (4-0) CASE #90-06; MINOR SUBDIVISION, 3947 roILING HILlS RD., JERRY MANSERGH council was referred to the Planner's report and Planning Ccanrnission minutes dated 5-2-90, relative to the request for a lot split, lDt 7, Block 29, Rolling Hills No.6, Mr. & Mrs. Jerry Mansergh. The Planner stated the 80,107 sq. ft. lot is proposed to be divided into Tract A, with 45,650 sq. ft. and the existing house, and Tract B, which would be a 34,457 sq. ft. lot. '!he applicant is proposing to constJ::uct a new home for himself on Tract B and will sell the existing home on Tract A. Bergly stated the Planning Commission reconunended approval of the requested lot split with six conditions, as listed in the minutes dated 5-2-90. He noted no variances are necessary to accomplish the lot split and the proposal meets all Ordinance requirements. Bergly explained Engineer Maurer reviewed the &Mer access and reconunended a sewer lift will have to be constructed by the applicant; the applicant is aware of this fact and has agreed to provide the lift. Public Works Supervisor Winkel stated a check valve should be installed to protect other residents in this area and the applicant fram a sewer back-up. Attorney Filla suggested council require the installation of the check valve be attached as a condition of approval. Hansen moved, seconded by Malone, to approve Case #90-06, lDt Division 3947 Rolling Hills Road, lDt 7, Block 29, Rolling Hills No.6, Jerry Mansergh, condition upon the following: '!hat the City Engineer and Attorney review and approve the division documents prior to filing and that necessary easements are secured. '!hat the City Engineer establish the minimum floor elevation to which sanitary sewer service can J:e provided. '!hat the Rice Creek Watershed District approve the proposed development plan and related requirements are met by the owner prior to issuance of a wilding perIni t. '!hat the proposed residence on Tract B be placed west of the point where Tract B is 95 feet wide. '!hat park dedication requirements for the additional wilding site J:e met prior to issuance of a wildirq permit.