My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC 05-01-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2002
>
PC 05-01-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:13 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:40:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLAN1\ING COMMISSION - MAY I, 2002 3 <br /> -- Commissioner Duehenes stated it seemed to her that there would need to be a reciprocal <br /> '., easement. She indicated the survey showed the existing drive going into the next lot. <br /> She asked ifthere would be an easement that would benefit the lot to the south, or would <br /> there be all access to Hamline A venue in the future. Mr. Parrish replied that was an <br /> existing condition, and currently applicant used that for overflow parking for the nursery <br /> business. He stated the nursery sales and Christmas tree sales would not be allowed if <br /> this was approved. <br /> Commissioner Duchenes asked what would it take for this to be considered an alley. Mr. <br /> Parrish replied that the City did not allow for alleys at this time. <br /> Chair Sand expressed concern that without a drainage plan it could not be known how <br /> this proposal would affect thc ncighbors, He requested if the drainage, utility, grading <br /> plans showed this would allect the neighbors, this not be approved, <br /> Commissioner Galatowitsch stated she could not find any special conditions that would <br /> deprive applicant the use oflhe land. She stated there was a home on the lot in a <br /> residential district. She indicated granting a variance could be detrimental to the <br /> sUlTounding property owners, and she did not believe this would be a good precedence to <br /> set in this area. She stated shc was not in favor of this request. <br /> Commissioner Galatowitscb moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmennan, to deny <br /> I Casc #02-07, 4350 Hamline Avenue North, Thomas & Kathleen Goserud Preliminary <br /> Plat Rcview, for the reasons there are no special conditions that would deprive applicant <br /> of the usc of the land; the variance could be detrimental to the surrounding property <br /> owners; and this was not a good precedence to set in this area, <br /> The motion carried llllanimously (7-0). <br /> CASE #02-08 - PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW, GUIDANT CORPORATION, 4100 <br /> HAMLlNE A VENUE NORTH - PUBLIC HEARING <br /> Staff reviewed their report April 25, 2002 and recommended approval of the preliminary <br /> plat for the reasons contained therein. <br /> Chair Sand opened the public bearing at 8 :05 p.m. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman stated he believed they were putting thc cart before the horse, <br /> He noted the Planning Commission could not act on replatting until Council addresscd <br /> the vacating of Femwood. Mr. Parrish replied the City Attomey indicated if the plat did <br /> receive preliminary approval, the actual vacation of property and casements could bc <br /> considered concurrent with the final platting ofthc property. <br /> Chair Sand stated he agrccd with Commissioner Zimmernlan, He stated he was reluctant <br /> . to go forward with this tonight without the traffic study. He stated he wanted to know <br /> what the traffic impact would havc at Cummings Park Drive for both Arden Hills, as well <br /> as the surrounding communities. He statcd he would be in favor of tabling this for more <br /> infonnation about the traffic study. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.