My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC 07-17-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2002
>
PC 07-17-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:13 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:40:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 17,2002 3 <br /> - Chair Sand asked if thc Dt\R regll1ations had changed since 1985 with respect to what <br /> could be built near the shoreline and if not, how did the DNR regulations, the Shoreline <br /> Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance interrelate. Mr. Panish replied he did not know the <br /> historical changes within the DNR regLllations but he did have peripheral knowledge as to <br /> what they were now. He indicated it was up to thc applicant to work with the DNR and <br /> the Rice Creek Watershed District. <br /> Mr. Parrish stated regardless of what the DNR said, the City was obligated to process the <br /> request based on the City's Shorelinc Ordinance. <br /> Chair Sand asked for the proposed sq Llare footage. Mr. Parrish replied it was <br /> approximately 730 square feet. <br /> Mr. Parrish stated there might be some conflict between the Shorcline Ordinance and the <br /> Zoning Ordinance, and it was a regular procedme to go with the more restrictive <br /> Ordinance in making their decisions. <br /> Roberta Thompson, 3413 Snelling Avenue, addresscd the hardship perspective regarding <br /> this request. She indicated all residents on the lake had the same type of hardship. She <br /> stated she needed additional storage also. She stated this was very common because of <br /> the type of lots that were on the lakeshorc. She expressed concern about the setback. She <br /> expressed concern about this setting prcccdence in the future and more residents <br /> requesting boathouses. She expressed concern about the size of the proposed boathouse. <br /> - She stated she did not agree with the hardship. She stated this was a challenge, but it was <br /> not something that they could not live without. She challenged the City to make sure the <br /> Ordinances were in sync. <br /> Mary Mee, 1520 Edgewater Avenue, stated when they bought their lots, it was a <br /> stipulation that no more than one structure was to be built on the lot. She stated she <br /> strongly disapproved having a boathouse put on the lake. She stated this was a small lake, <br /> and it would encourage larger boats. She expressed concern about the safety issues and <br /> the destruction of the beauty of the shoreline. She stated once they had one boathouse, <br /> there would be more. She asked the Commission to deny this request. <br /> Mary Ellen Stanton, stated she was concerned about the aesthetics with a boathouse put <br /> on the shoreline. She stated right now everything was open and if a boathouse was put on <br /> the lake, it would obstruct this view. <br /> Rebecca Krieg, 3382 Lake Johanna Boulevard, objected to this request because it would <br /> clutter the lake and set precedence for thc future. <br /> Bill _, 1541 Edgewater Boulcvard, stated they had been informed that only the home <br /> and garage was allowed on the lake. He expressed concern about the geology of the area <br /> with allowing boathouses. He expressed cone em about setting precedence for future <br /> boathouses. <br /> e Marie Bezdicek, 3324 Lake Johmma Boulevard, Lake Johmma Home Improvement <br /> association, stated she had received many calls cxpressing concem about this setting a <br /> precedence and expressed concem about the pristine beauty of the shoreline and the <br /> preservation ofthat view. She requested the Commission deny the Special Use Permit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.