My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC 07-17-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2002
>
PC 07-17-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:13 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:40:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 17,2002 4 <br /> ~ Ms. Thompson stated there were seven smaller structures (shcds) on other lots on the <br /> lake. She stated she did not know how long those structures had been on the lake. She <br /> stated she was told ifher shed were damaged bcyond repair, she would not be allowed to <br /> rebuild it. <br /> Council Member Aplikowski stated Ms. Hansen's boathouse was built in 1940. <br /> Rosemary McMonigal, McMonigal Architects, addressed the blocking of vicws. She <br /> stated there were significant trees along the Northwestern College side, mId this structure <br /> would be a low profile and blend into the trees and landscaping. She stated the structure <br /> had been proposed within the guidelines. She stated cunent1y Mr. Berndt's wall was <br /> collapsing, which needed repair and applicant wanted to improve this area. <br /> Belly Stanton, 1560 Edgcwatcr Avenue, stated the lots were quite nanow and many <br /> people on the block had boats, which were moored on the docks. She expressed concern <br /> about this setting precedence and other people wanting boathouses also. <br /> Mr. Berndt stated when all of the lots were sold, there were restrictive covenants in the <br /> deeds, which had expired. He stated there were no outstanding covenants. He stated he <br /> did not believe a dock with boats moored to them, was any more unsightly than a <br /> boathouse. He stated the lake would not accommodate large boats and he did not believe <br /> ~ anyone would want to put a large boat on the lake. He stated where they were proposing <br /> to build the boathouse, only people across the lake would be able to see it. <br /> Mary Ellen Stanton, stated there were docks with the awnings on them that were not there <br /> in the winter time and she believed this was di fferent than a pelTIlanent structure. She <br /> stated this reqnest would block a view of the lake. <br /> Stcvc Nelson stated he believed boathouses in general were unsightly. He expressed <br /> concern about setting precedence for others who would want a boathouse. He requested if <br /> the City allowed boathouses, they establish criteria for boathouses that everyone needed <br /> to comply with. He asked the Commission to reconsider this request. <br /> Ms. Thomson stated she also had to rebuild her shoreline, which did not entail a <br /> boathouse. She stated a boatlift on a property was very different from a boathouse. <br /> Chair Sand asked what did the residents do with their summer equipment in the winter. <br /> He stated he believed the shoreline looked unsightly during the winter. Ms. Thompson <br /> replied they paid for of1~sitc storage. She stated the boatlifts and the docks were usually <br /> put on shore and as long as they were put on the shore neatly, that was not a problem. She <br /> stated the docks and the lifts could not stay in the lake due to ice damage. <br /> Commissioner Lemberg cited a couple of propertics where they did not stack their docks <br /> and boatlifts. Ms. Thomson replied those property owners did not have a large enough lot <br /> e to properly stack the docks. <br /> Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.