My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC 02-02-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2005
>
PC 02-02-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:16 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:47:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 2, 2005 2 <br /> 1. The applicant shall continue to abide by the conditions of approval listed in Special <br />. Use Permit #70-36 except for the site plan amendment discussed. <br /> 2. No construction shall occur on all or part of Lots I, 2, or 3, Block 3, Lake Josephine <br /> Villas prior to those properties being platted into one residential lot which meets the <br /> minimum requirements for the R-2: Single and Two Family Residential Zoning <br /> District. <br /> 3. If membership or guest attendance increases to a point where 12 parking spaces are <br /> utilized on a recurring basis, then the Oddfellow's Lodge would be required to <br /> construct the matching parking area shown as "additional space for parking if ever <br /> needed" on the site plan and included in City Planning File #05-04. <br /> 4. The proposed new parking area and any future parking, as discussed in Condition #3, <br /> shall be graded to drain toward the northeast comer of the new parking area. The <br /> grading and drainage shall take special care to avoid any adverse drainage effects on <br /> Lots 1,2, or 3, Block 3, Lake Josephine Villas. <br /> 5. Screening of at least 60% opacity shall be provided along the north, east, and south <br /> sides of the new parking lot as proposed on the site plans on file in City,planning file <br /> #05-04. Screening may be accomplished by a 3-foot high privacy style fence or <br /> coniferous shrubs to a minimum height of3 feet. Screening shall require the approval <br /> of the City Planner prior to the issuance of any Building or Zoning Permits. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman inquired about the park dedication requirement. Mr. <br /> Hellegers replied the City Attorney had indicated park dedication would not be <br /> something that would be collected because the properties would be consolidated and this <br />. was not a matter of a subdivision. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman asked if the intent was to subdivide the lot and sell the lots <br /> off to development. Mr. Hellegers replied what applicant proposed was to put this into <br /> onclot. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman believed if the end result was to sell of the property for <br /> development, then they should coUect park dedication fees. <br /> Mr. Clark replied they would have the City Attorney review this again and put his <br /> opinion in writing. <br /> Commissioner Modesette noted the two lots across the street appeared independent and <br /> other lots had been consolidated to make nice size lots. Mr. HeUegers replied the two lots <br /> across the street were built without platting. He noted applicant was proposing to cut the <br /> three lots off and sell them as one parcel. <br /> Commissioner Larson asked if the City held an easement along the street. Mr. Hellegers <br /> replied they did. <br /> Chair Sand noted in connection with any motion they would need to make the special <br /> finding. <br />. Chair Sand asked if the application included platting of the three lots into one lot. Mr. <br /> Hellegers replied this particular application did not. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.