My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC 05-04-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2005
>
PC 05-04-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:19 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:48:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 4,2005 5 <br /> Commissioner Bezdicek asked what the ramification of their decision would have on Mr. <br />. Peterson's negotiations with Ramsey County. Mr. Peterson responded he believed their <br /> decision would have somewhat of an impact on what would happen. <br /> Chair Sand asked to what extent the Commission had the authority to do this. He noted <br /> they did not have the authority to deny this because the County had eminent domain <br /> authority. Mr. Clark responded what was important was to make sure the Commission <br /> separated the issues that Mr. Peterson's remedies were an issue between the County and <br /> the property owner and what the City was doing was saying there would be an impact to <br /> the property in the structure being non-conforming once the road was widened and <br /> therefore, the Peterson's would need a variance for the non-conforming structure, which <br /> would be helpful to both the Petersons and the City. <br /> Commissioner Larson asked if granting the variance at this time was timely considering <br /> the negotiation was not complete. He asked if this favored the County. Mr. Clark replied <br /> all they were remedying was one issue, which was the non-conformity. <br /> Commissioner Larson asked if the variance was in place, did this aid the County because <br /> there was not the non-conformity question. Mr. Clark replied from his perspective, the <br /> answer would be no because there was two issues - the non-conformity and the <br /> negotiations the County was having with Mr. Peterson. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman asked what brought this to the City's attentio~. Mr. Clark <br />. responded staff had looked awhile ago at what properties were going to be ilffected with <br /> this road reconstruction and staff wanted to make sure that these types of requests were <br /> all done at one time. He noted it was quite common to look at these issues in advance of <br /> a road reconstruction. <br /> Chair Sand asked if the County had already prepared a survey. Mr. Clark' replied they <br /> had. <br /> Chair Sand indicated the only thing that had not been established was the amount of <br /> compensation to the Petersons. Mr. Clark replied that was correct. <br /> Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. <br /> Commissioner Thompson moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerrn<l11 to approve <br /> Planning Case No. 05-14, The City of Arden Hills, 1 I05 Amble Drive, vhiance. The <br /> motion carried unanimously (6-0). I <br /> I <br /> C. PLANNING CASE 05-05: CITY OF ADEN HILLS, 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96: <br /> REZONING THE OLD CITY HALL AND PUBLIC WORKS SITE (1440-1450 <br /> HIGHWAY 96) FROM R-l: SINGLE-F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL TO NB: <br /> . <br /> NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS <br />. Mr. Hellegers stated applicant was requesting rezoning the western portion of the old <br /> City Hall/Public Works site from R-]: Single Family Residential to NB: Neighborhood <br /> Business. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.