Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 4, 2005 6 <br /> Staff recommended rezoning the west 397.5 feet of the north 276.82 feet of the Northeast <br /> . Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 Township 30 Range 23 from R-I Single <br /> Family Residential to NB Neighborhood Business. <br /> Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. <br /> Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the rezoning to come forward and make <br /> comment. <br /> Greg Redman, I480 Arden View Drive, representing Arden Hills Townhome Board, <br /> stated he was representing the association directly south of this proposal. He stated the <br /> Board did not have any specific objection to the rezoning, but the Board did have some <br /> concerns with the subsequent development proposal and reserved the Board's right to <br /> comment on that proposal. <br /> Chair Sand noted they were reserving comments as to how the property was developed, <br /> but they did not oppose the rezoning. Mr. Redman replied that was correct. <br /> Gail Van Buskirk, 1390 Arden View Drive, stated she was opposed to the zoning change <br /> because she believed the Comprehensive Plan was taking over green space and making <br /> more industrial area. She expressed concern that there were a lot of industrial areas being <br /> put in the City. She noted she was not opposed to residential homes or townhomes being <br /> put in this area, but she did not want to see a neighborhood business put in. She indicated <br /> . putting in a neighborhood business would be a waste ofthis site. <br /> Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. <br /> Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Thompson, to approve <br /> Planning Case No. 05-05, the City of Arden Hills, I245 West Highway 96; Rezoning the <br /> Old City Hall and Public Works Site (1440-I450 Highway 96) from R-I: Single Family <br /> Residential to NB: Neighborhood Business. <br /> Commissioncr Bezdicek asked if this was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. <br /> HeUegers responded it was. <br /> The motion carried unanimously (6-0). <br /> D. PL^<NNINC CASE OS 12: ROYAL OAKS REALTY, 1000 COUNTY ROAD E <br /> WEST, SIIOREVIEW, 1\'J:INNESOT.^<: MASTER A..~D FINf.L PUD f~~D <br /> PRELIMINARY PL^<T FOR OLD CITY IIf.LL f~~D PUBLIC WORKS SITE <br /> (lHO 14S0 IIICIIW.^< Y 96 <br /> Continued to the June I, 2004 Planning Commissioner meeting. <br /> UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> . None. <br />