Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . D. The plans show that half of the height of the first floor and the basement will be located <br /> at an elevation below that of the garage. The result may be that the structure would have <br /> water seepage into the first floor or basement of the home. The applicant should review <br /> the grading and elevation and shall provide a revised grading and drainage plan, showing <br /> the elevations of the floors and the elevations of the surrounding property, which shall <br /> require the approval of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any building permits. <br /> E. According to the proposed plans, the location of the proposed patio appears to encroach <br /> into the root area of the large Maple tree. The applicant should review the plans and may <br /> want to have a longer, rectangular patio that stretches out along the side of the house to <br /> help preserve the health and root structure of the Maple tree. <br /> F. Ramsey County property information shows that the existing structure has asbestos <br /> siding which will require that the siding be removed and disposed of properly. <br /> Options <br /> 1. Recommend approval as submitted. <br /> 2. Recommend approval with conditions. <br /> 3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, <br /> "...it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request." <br /> 4. Table for additional information. <br /> . Deadline for Al!encv Actions <br /> The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on March 7, 2005 <br /> Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by May 6, 2005 (60 days), <br /> unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review <br /> period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120 <br /> days. <br /> Resident Comments <br /> The neighboring property owner from 3233 Shoreline Lane visited City Hall with questions <br /> about the variance. The neighbor had some concerns about the preservation of the spruce trees at <br /> the NE comer of the property, the direction of drainage, property lines, and the proximity of the <br /> proposed structure to the neighbor's property line. <br /> Staff has not received any other comments from residents on this variance request. <br /> Attachments <br /> 4b-1 Location Map, Vicinity Address Map <br /> 4b-2 Plans and statement submitted by the applicant. <br /> . \\EarlhlPlanning\Planning Cases\2fJ05105-11 Karjalahti Variance (PENDING)\04-06-05 PC Report Karjaluhti Variance. doc <br /> Page 70/7 <br />